Selkirk Mental Health Centre: Difference between revisions

(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 2:

Allan Garland checked with two physicians that work in area and decided that this should be treated as a [[Chronic Health Facility]].

{{DiscussTask|

* currently aggregated as "PCH" because [[S dispo.loc type]] is PCH. That seems wrong. Should it be changed to “unknown/other” or to a new category “Mental Health”? And should we add [https://edenhealthcare.ca/ Eden Mental Health Centre] as well? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:21, 29 October 2025 (CDT)

}}

== Collection Instructions ==

Line 7:

Line 11:

* [[Pre acute living situation field]] - code "'''Chronic Care Facility'''"

* [[Pre-admit Inpatient Institution]] - code "'''NA / not applicable'''" if direct, or as applicable if indirect

{{DT| I am unclear with these instructions, if indirect code as applicable? if we are using chronic care facility, like we do for Riverview and DLC, we have Riverview as an option for if they arrive as a direct or indirect, but now DLC and Selkirk mental health are not an option, shouldn't we be treating these all the same? There is a question on the [[Chronic Health Facility]] [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 17:50, 16 June 2025 (CDT)}}

{{DT|

*I am unclear with these instructions, if indirect code as applicable? if we are using chronic care facility, like we do for Riverview and [[Deer Lodge (DLC)]], we have Riverview as an option for if they arrive as a direct or indirect, but now [[Deer Lodge (DLC)]] and Selkirk mental health are not an option, shouldn't we be treating these all the same? There is a question on the [[Chronic Health Facility]] [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 17:50, 16 June 2025 (CDT)

** I agree we should treat them the same. Also, there is now [https://edenhealthcare.ca/ Eden Mental Health Centre] in Winkler, which is listed together with Selkirk on the [[File:GRA ALC Form.pdf | ALC form]]. Selkirk groups together with PCHs when reported, so to treat Eden similar to Selkirk in the absence of separate record, the most consistent coding would be "Manitoba PCH outside of Winnipeg". That is probably not where a user of our data would expect to find this. Should we consider any of the residential addiction treatment centres the same way (Bruce Oake Recovery Centre, Native Addictions Council of Manitoba, ...)?

}}

* [[Previous Location]] - code "'''Selkirk Mental Health Centre'''"

* [[Dispo]] - code "'''Selkirk Mental Health Centre'''"

=== Log ===

2022-04-21 - added as a specific option to [[s_dispo table]]

2022-04-21 - added as a specific option to [[s_dispo table]] "similar to [[St.Amant]]"

== Related articles ==

[[Category:Pre-acute living situation]]

[[Category:Admit/Discharge]]

[[Category:Registry Data]]

[[Category:Data Collection Guide]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Allan Garland checked with two physicians that work in area and decided that this should be treated as a [[Chronic Health Facility]].
+{{DiscussTask|
+* currently aggregated as "PCH" because [[S dispo.loc type]] is PCH. That seems wrong. Should it be changed to “unknown/other” or to a new category “Mental Health”? And should we add [https://edenhealthcare.ca/ Eden Mental Health Centre] as well? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:21, 29 October 2025 (CDT)
+ }}
 == Collection Instructions ==
@@ Line 7: / Line 11: @@
 * [[Pre acute living situation field]] - code "'''Chronic Care Facility'''"
 * [[Pre-admit Inpatient Institution]] - code "'''NA / not applicable'''"  if direct, or as applicable if indirect
-{{DT| I am unclear with these instructions, if indirect code as applicable?  if we are using chronic care facility, like we do for Riverview and DLC, we have Riverview as an option for if they arrive as a direct or indirect, but now DLC and Selkirk mental health are not an option, shouldn't we be treating these all the same?  There is a question on the [[Chronic Health Facility]]    [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 17:50, 16 June 2025 (CDT)}}
+{{DT|
+*I am unclear with these instructions, if indirect code as applicable?  if we are using chronic care facility, like we do for Riverview and [[Deer Lodge (DLC)]], we have Riverview as an option for if they arrive as a direct or indirect, but now [[Deer Lodge (DLC)]] and Selkirk mental health are not an option, shouldn't we be treating these all the same?  There is a question on the [[Chronic Health Facility]]    [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 17:50, 16 June 2025 (CDT)
+** I agree we should treat them the same. Also, there is now [https://edenhealthcare.ca/ Eden Mental Health Centre] in Winkler, which is listed together with Selkirk on the [[File:GRA ALC Form.pdf | ALC form]]. Selkirk groups together with PCHs when reported, so to treat Eden similar to Selkirk in the absence of separate record, the most consistent coding would be "Manitoba PCH outside of Winnipeg". That is probably not where a user of our data would expect to find this. Should we consider any of the residential addiction treatment centres the same way (Bruce Oake Recovery Centre, Native Addictions Council of Manitoba, ...)?
+}}
 * [[Previous Location]] - code "'''Selkirk Mental Health Centre'''"
 * [[Dispo]] - code "'''Selkirk Mental Health Centre'''"
 === Log ===
--04-21 - added as a specific option to [[s_dispo table]]
+-04-21 - added as a specific option to [[s_dispo table]] "similar to [[St.Amant]]"
+== Related articles ==
+{{Related Articles}}
+[[Category:Pre-acute living situation]]
+[[Category:Admit/Discharge]]
+[[Category:Registry Data]]
+[[Category:Data Collection Guide]]