|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Category contains all article relating to renal insufficiency. | | Category contains all article relating to renal insufficiency. |
| | | [[Category: Renal (old)]] |
| {{Discussion}}
| |
| Hi collectors, I see we have discrepancy for renal insufficiency definition that have been there a long time.
| |
| *Renal Insufficiency:
| |
| *'''Comorbid'''
| |
| **[[Renal insufficiency-mild (creatinine 160-240 mmol)]]
| |
| **[[Renal Insufficiency-moderate (Cr greater than 240)]]
| |
| *'''Admit or complication'''
| |
| **[[ARI]] there is a different range - creatinine rise of >250 mmol OR a rise of >100 mmol from baseline over 24 hrs.
| |
| *'''No dialysis''' or
| |
| *'''N history of CRF'''
| |
| **if patient required acute dialysis, it is not due to renal insufficiency - please see [[ARF]]
| |
| **This is in the code book but not on the Wiki. (code books OLD so folks should not use).
| |
| | |
| | |
| ==Question==
| |
| *IC10 is coming to a laptop near you soon, so we hope this will clean this problem up.
| |
| | |
| * What criteria do you follow to code renal insufficiency as an admit or acquired DX?
| |
| ** Seems to me that the criteria are clear for comorbids, and clear for diagnoses. I can not see any ambiguity unless people want to compare criteria for two different things. Am I missing something? What is the discrepancy? Ttenbergen 10:06, 2014 October 9 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| *I see no discrepancy. The definitions are clear to me. thanks Judy K. Apr 1, 2015.
| |
| [[Category: Renal]]
| |
| [[Category: Take to Task team meeting]]
| |
| | |
| * I don't see that there is a discrepancy either. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems clear to ME. --mvpenner 13:54, 2015 April 13 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| * I wonder if this was about the admit/acquired using different cut-off than the comorbid. Does anyone thing this could cause collection errors? Or do you think this was about something else? Ttenbergen 15:14, 2015 April 15 (CDT)
| |
| * Everyone has a baseline Cr so I think most people use the second criteria (>100 over baseline in 24 hours). Maybe the >250 rule should be the same as the lower limit of renal insufficiency (>160) instead if you want it that way. Laura
| |
| **I thought that we were waiting for ICD-10 before making changes to ARI or pretty much any renal questions because they will be handled differently. Con
| |
Category contains all article relating to renal insufficiency.