Proposed Notes field default: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
DPageNewton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
***I like the tiss checked part first so I can see it when I have the patient list open to keep track of which tiss sheets I have already checked while on the ward without opening each. --[[User:LBilesky|LBilesky]] 07:34, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | ***I like the tiss checked part first so I can see it when I have the patient list open to keep track of which tiss sheets I have already checked while on the ward without opening each. --[[User:LBilesky|LBilesky]] 07:34, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | ||
***As a medicine collector, I would keep the time and date first, as we have no use for the TISS or Pharm counts. Would there be a different list for medicine? We would only need read to and labs.[[User:Mlagadi|Mlagadi]] 08:21, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | ***As a medicine collector, I would keep the time and date first, as we have no use for the TISS or Pharm counts. Would there be a different list for medicine? We would only need read to and labs.[[User:Mlagadi|Mlagadi]] 08:21, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | ||
***I totally agree with Michelle. I put the "read to" date and time absolutely first, so that when I go to review charts after the first time, I will sort my list by notes. When I put the date and time in first it shows on the list, so I can see it. If this were to change, then I would no longer be able to sort the list, and be able to easily see that date and time. I also agree with Michelle in that the medicine collectors have no use for the tiss, pharmacy, and labs. In fact, for us medicine collectors, that would just clutter up the notes field. As someone who uses the notes field extensively, I personally need all the room I can get it that field. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 08:31, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | |||