H1N1: Difference between revisions

BDeVlaming (talk | contribs)
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:
== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
{{discussion}}
{{discussion}}
===June 12.09===
* Just some clarification...any patient who is positive for Influenza A should be coded in TMP as a '''suspected H1N1'''.  H1N1 is a subspecies of Influenza A.   
* Just some clarification...any patient who is positive for Influenza A should be coded in TMP as a '''suspected H1N1'''.  H1N1 is a subspecies of Influenza A.   
   
   
Line 46: Line 48:
***No, don't tag unless positive culture for H1N1 or we'll have way to many cases.  Tag if positive for H1N1 even if no CAP...influenza often triggers asthma or COPD exacerbation. Anand Kumar, MD.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:30, 15 June 2009 (CDT)
***No, don't tag unless positive culture for H1N1 or we'll have way to many cases.  Tag if positive for H1N1 even if no CAP...influenza often triggers asthma or COPD exacerbation. Anand Kumar, MD.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:30, 15 June 2009 (CDT)


*June 15.09  
===June 15.09===
**Any CAP or COPD that comes in whether they are placed in isolation or not and a swab is sent, should be considered suspect and tagged as such?[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:36, 15 June 2009 (CDT)
**Any CAP or COPD that comes in whether they are placed in isolation or not and a swab is sent, should be considered suspect and tagged as such?[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:36, 15 June 2009 (CDT)
***People are going to start screening for H1N1 just in case. That is probably what they are doing. Same with CAP/COPD isolation…it’s just precautionary.  I would only tag '''suspected H1N1''' if they start '''oseltamivir'''. Anand Kumar.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:36, 15 June 2009 (CDT)
***People are going to start screening for H1N1 just in case. That is probably what they are doing. Same with CAP/COPD isolation…it’s just precautionary.  I would only tag '''suspected H1N1''' if they start '''oseltamivir'''. Anand Kumar.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:36, 15 June 2009 (CDT)
Line 58: Line 60:
**No.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:52, 17 June 2009 (CDT)
**No.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:52, 17 June 2009 (CDT)


* I have a pt who was tagged as suspect, but the result was negative for any influenza virus.  Would it be easier if we had another tag for confirmed negative?  I am wondering if it would save time later for people following up on the influenza patients.
===June 17,09===
*I have a pt who was tagged as suspect, but the result was negative for any influenza virus.  Would it be easier if we had another tag for confirmed negative?  I am wondering if it would save time later for people following up on the influenza patients.
[[User:BDeVlaming|BDeVlaming]] 16:12, 17 June 2009 (CDT)
[[User:BDeVlaming|BDeVlaming]] 16:12, 17 June 2009 (CDT)
**Yes.  I will add this option tomorrow.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 22:44, 17 June 2009 (CDT)
[[Category: UPL]]
[[Category: UPL]]
[[Category: Virus]]
[[Category: Virus]]
[[Category:Special Short Term Projects]]
[[Category:Special Short Term Projects]]