Team Meeting December 2, 2009: Difference between revisions
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
*****Would it be beneficial to have the ACCESS priortize the acquired complications? What I mean by this is often a pt will end up with more than 9 acquireds and it is up to the data collector to decide which ones should be deleted and which ones should not. Sometimes it is not always clear which ones to keep because I don't know which ones give more points or which ones are more important to send. We use to have to decide this with comos but now we enter all of them and ACCESS then priortizes for us. Can something similar be done with the acquireds?--[[User:MWaschuk|MWaschuk]] 09:22, 16 November 2009 (CST) | *****Would it be beneficial to have the ACCESS priortize the acquired complications? What I mean by this is often a pt will end up with more than 9 acquireds and it is up to the data collector to decide which ones should be deleted and which ones should not. Sometimes it is not always clear which ones to keep because I don't know which ones give more points or which ones are more important to send. We use to have to decide this with comos but now we enter all of them and ACCESS then priortizes for us. Can something similar be done with the acquireds?--[[User:MWaschuk|MWaschuk]] 09:22, 16 November 2009 (CST) | ||
*do we still need to put the green sheets on the Medicine charts? | |||
[[Category: Data Collection Team Meetings]] | [[Category: Data Collection Team Meetings]] | ||