Ward admission log forms: Difference between revisions

Line 38:

** I intentionally worded the option a bit polarized; Also, I am not sure how to better consult collectors - I put up this article and implemented what I understood to be a summary of suggestions. I know you said you didn's see value in it but I didn't understand it as _not_ wanting, just as not really caring one way or the other. I think some collectors mentioned in their comments reasons why whey wanted the DOB/PHIN/CHART; I don't feel able to evaluate their comments because I have not done collection, let alone in all the different ways it's done at all the sites. I suspect that the discrepancy in how collection is done at different sites is one of the main reasons how this all came up. Thanks for voting, and I hope collectors will take you up in the invitation to explain why those fields would be helpful.

*I don't see the value of having DOB/PHIN/CHART# on this page as it makes it very difficult to read for starters but if you need to look something up on KEA/labs you need to open the patient profile to see what you are actually checking for.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 13:17, 2012 October 1 (CDT)

Marla Penner. I don't like the new "additional information" added with the patient names on the pt list. I find it time consuming to scroll back and forth for information that was visible before. I vote to delete the PHIN and DOB unless it is absolutely nec for some reason that escapes me. Thx.

===Options===

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 ** I intentionally worded the option a bit polarized; Also, I am not sure how to better consult collectors - I put up this article and implemented what I understood to be a summary of suggestions. I know you said you didn's see value in it but I didn't understand it as _not_ wanting, just as not really caring one way or the other. I think some collectors mentioned in their comments reasons why whey wanted the DOB/PHIN/CHART; I don't feel able to evaluate their comments because I have not done collection, let alone in all the different ways it's done at all the sites. I suspect that the discrepancy in how collection is done at different sites is one of the main reasons how this all came up. Thanks for voting, and I hope collectors will take you up in the invitation to explain why those fields would be helpful.
 *I don't see the value of having DOB/PHIN/CHART# on this page as it makes it very difficult to read for starters but if you need to look something up on KEA/labs you need to open the patient profile to see what you are actually checking for.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 13:17, 2012 October 1 (CDT)
+Marla Penner.  I don't like the new "additional information" added with the patient names on the pt list.  I find it time consuming to scroll back and forth for information that was visible before. I vote to delete the PHIN and DOB unless it is absolutely nec for some reason that escapes me. Thx.
 ===Options===