Septic Shock: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
About 10% of cases of septic shock in the database are overtly miscoded and are really obviously something else. Another 10% are not clearly septic shock. 80% are solidly coded. This is higher than any other database he has used.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:15, 2012 June 11 (CDT) | About 10% of cases of septic shock in the database are overtly miscoded and are really obviously something else. Another 10% are not clearly septic shock. 80% are solidly coded. This is higher than any other database he has used.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:15, 2012 June 11 (CDT) | ||
*It would be nice to compare with Dr Kumar which cases he felt were not true septic shock pictures and use that info to help us in fine tuning our data collecting.In other words to learn from our mistakes. | *It would be nice to compare with Dr Kumar which cases he felt were not true septic shock pictures and use that info to help us in fine tuning our data collecting.In other words to learn from our mistakes. | ||
*<pre>{{ICD10}}</pre> | |||
[[Category: Shock]] | [[Category: Shock]] | ||
[[Category: Sepsis]] | [[Category: Sepsis]] | ||
[[Category: Diagnosis Coding]] | [[Category: Diagnosis Coding]] | ||