H1N1: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BDeVlaming (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:
*let me know if any concerns.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 20:59, 10 June 2009 (CDT)   
*let me know if any concerns.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 20:59, 10 June 2009 (CDT)   


 
***I have a pt now who is positive for influenza A. I have coded CAP with influenza...because I have not checked either of the temp suspected or confirmed, will it generate querries down the road?  should we also have a place to check if it is another type of influenza?  [[User:BDeVlaming|BDeVlaming]] 10:47, 11 June 2009 (CDT)


{{stub}}
{{stub}}
[[Category: UPL]]
[[Category: UPL]]
[[Category: Virus]]
[[Category: Virus]]

Revision as of 09:47, 11 June 2009

  • Will start tagging retropective and NEW admissions.TOstryzniuk 21:25, 10 June 2009 (CDT)
  • added to s_tmp table:
    • H1N1 suspected
    • H1N1 confirmed

Data Integrity

  • If N1N1 suspected
  • Tmp item should be H1N1 suspected with Date
AND


  • If H1N1 is confirmed
  • TMP item should be H1N1 confirmed with Date
AND
  • Confirmation of DX should be marked in chart. If patient is discharged or moved without culture report then TMP option of suspected N1N1 remains and there should be and infection coded with subcode 75 influenza virus
  • there is alternate tracking being done and I will look after this to update tag in tmpv2 Working with Kumar.TOstryzniuk 20:59, 10 June 2009 (CDT)


  • let me know if any concerns.TOstryzniuk 20:59, 10 June 2009 (CDT)
      • I have a pt now who is positive for influenza A. I have coded CAP with influenza...because I have not checked either of the temp suspected or confirmed, will it generate querries down the road? should we also have a place to check if it is another type of influenza? BDeVlaming 10:47, 11 June 2009 (CDT)

Template:Stub