Query NDC Pacemaker acquired vs TISS: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LegacyContent
|explanation= see [[#log]]
|content=
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
|DIC_summary=Records with [[Acquired Procedure]] of [[Pacemaker insertion, temporary]] that  don't have date-matching [[Pacemaker insertion (TISS Item)|Pacemaker insertion]] or vice versa.
|DIC_summary=Records with [[Acquired Procedure]] of [[Pacemaker insertion, temporary]] that  don't have date-matching [[Pacemaker insertion (TISS Item)|Pacemaker insertion]] or vice versa.
Line 20: Line 24:
== Related articles ==
== Related articles ==
{{Related Articles}}
{{Related Articles}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:42, 2021 October 7

Legacy Content

This page contains Legacy Content.
  • Explanation: see #log
  • Successor: No successor was entered

Click Expand to show legacy content.

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: Records with Acquired Procedure of Pacemaker insertion, temporary that don't have date-matching Pacemaker insertion or vice versa.
Related: Pacemaker insertion, permanent, Pacemaker insertion, temporary, Permanent Pacemaker Insertion, Pacemaker insertion (TISS Item)
Firmness: hard check
Timing: complete
App: Centralized data front end.accdb
Coding: query NDC_Pacemaker_TISS_vs_acquired
Uses L Problem table: Yes
Status: retired
Implementation Date: 2019/01/06
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:

This query includes incomplete patients; the Data Processor only checks into incompletes during reporting time.

Log


Related articles

Related articles: