Peer Audit: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{discussion}} | {{discussion}} | ||
*You have stated that the audit is to check precision as opposed to accuracy, but the next paragraph talks about Julie tabulating & quantifying accuracy. Isn't this contradictory?--[[User:Jpeterson|Jpeterson]] 14:42, 27 November 2009 (CST) | *You have stated that the audit is to check precision as opposed to accuracy, but the next paragraph talks about Julie tabulating & quantifying accuracy. Isn't this contradictory?--[[User:Jpeterson|Jpeterson]] 14:42, 27 November 2009 (CST) | ||
** Made changes on the statement above. [[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:16, 2 December 2009 (CST) | |||
Once we have identified the elements which showed large discrepancies or variability, we will identify the reasons why, suggest changes to reduce the variation in the data, implement the changes and re-assess again to see if the change results in improvement in the quality of the data. This will largely happen ad-hoc using the wiki. We may also come back to you personally to find out why there are discrepancies, but this is to find the reasons and fix the underlying problem, not to criticize individuals. | Once we have identified the elements which showed large discrepancies or variability, we will identify the reasons why, suggest changes to reduce the variation in the data, implement the changes and re-assess again to see if the change results in improvement in the quality of the data. This will largely happen ad-hoc using the wiki. We may also come back to you personally to find out why there are discrepancies, but this is to find the reasons and fix the underlying problem, not to criticize individuals. | ||