LAU Collection Project: Difference between revisions

Line 84:

I am concerned that if I set program{{=}}"Med" we will similarly have these records show up mixed in with med data. For collection that will probably be fine since the cross checks etc should mostly be like for med records. But for anything Julie does with the data, this may be an issue.

Once the collection project is complete we duplicate centralized_data.accdb and delete the LAU records from the master one, an only keep them in a project file. But: will this be a problem during the project? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 23:13, 5 March 2025 (CST)

* Could we switch them to Facility_med, which Julie should be able to filter out, because they would be the 3 sites we don't normally collect? and in the tmp we will know if they are rehab vs LAU based on service, or there is probably alot more behind the scenes that I am missing??? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 06:40, 6 March 2025 (CST)}}

* Could we switch them to Facility_med, which Julie should be able to filter out, because they would be the 3 sites we don't normally collect? and in the tmp we will know if they are rehab vs LAU based on service, or there is probably alot more behind the scenes that I am missing??? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 06:40, 6 March 2025 (CST)

**As long as there is a data field which will identify the LAU's whether in tmp or in the service_location field (is this still active?) or serial number (have it started with high digit or with a letter followed by number) , I can filter them out if needed for analysis even if we keep them as Program {{=}}"Med". The only concern is when we share the database to MCHP. Tina should remove those LAU's from Centralized data and PHI before I give them to MCHP. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 09:29, 6 March 2025 (CST)

}}

== Processing / Analysis ==

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 I am concerned that if I set program{{=}}"Med" we will similarly have these records show up mixed in with med data. For collection that will probably be fine since the cross checks etc should mostly be like for med records. But for anything Julie does with the data, this may be an issue.
 Once the collection project is complete we duplicate centralized_data.accdb and delete the LAU records from the master one, an only keep them in a project file. But: will this be a problem during the project? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 23:13, 5 March 2025 (CST)
-* Could we switch them to Facility_med, which Julie should be able to filter out, because they would be the 3 sites we don't normally collect? and in the tmp we will know if they are rehab vs LAU based on service, or there is probably alot more behind the scenes that I am missing???  [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 06:40, 6 March 2025 (CST)}}
+* Could we switch them to Facility_med, which Julie should be able to filter out, because they would be the 3 sites we don't normally collect? and in the tmp we will know if they are rehab vs LAU based on service, or there is probably alot more behind the scenes that I am missing???  [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 06:40, 6 March 2025 (CST)
+**As long as there is a data field which will identify the LAU's whether in tmp or in the service_location field (is this still active?) or serial number (have it started with high digit or with a letter followed by number) , I can filter them out if needed for analysis even if we keep them as Program {{=}}"Med".  The only concern is when we share the database to MCHP. Tina should remove those LAU's from Centralized data and PHI before I give them to MCHP.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 09:29, 6 March 2025 (CST)
+}}
 == Processing / Analysis ==