St.Amant: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://stamant.ca/about-us/ St.Amant]  supports over 5,000 people in Manitoba with developmental disabilities, autism and acquired brain injury. They provide a variety of services, but in the context of our data collection we are usually considering their [https://stamant.ca/services/adult-seniors/residential/community-residential-program/ community residential program].  
[https://stamant.ca/about-us/ St.Amant]  supports over 5,000 people in Manitoba with developmental disabilities, autism and acquired brain injury. They provide a variety of services, but in the context of our data collection we are usually considering their residential program.
 
They used to provide full residential care in their facility. Most has been used to other living arrangements (see [https://stamant.ca/services/adult-seniors/residential/community-residential-program/ community residential program]), but when we looked into this in 2024 we found it still reasonable to keep this option as a [[Chronic Health Facility]].  
<!-- Yes it is still relevant in this list [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 20:47, 2024 December 3 (CST) -->


{{Discuss |  
{{Discuss |  
Line 6: Line 9:


== Log ==
== Log ==
 
* 2024-12-03 - reviewed that it still makes sense to include this as a [[Chronic Health Facility]]


* [[CCMDB.mdb Change Log 2008 | 2008-01-31]] re-added because it went missing
* [[CCMDB.mdb Change Log 2008 | 2008-01-31]] re-added because it went missing

Revision as of 14:47, 29 October 2025

St.Amant supports over 5,000 people in Manitoba with developmental disabilities, autism and acquired brain injury. They provide a variety of services, but in the context of our data collection we are usually considering their residential program.

They used to provide full residential care in their facility. Most has been used to other living arrangements (see community residential program), but when we looked into this in 2024 we found it still reasonable to keep this option as a Chronic Health Facility.

  • Is that actually true, that we use the code for patients in one of their residential programs? Would we even know the patient is, considering many are now set up as home-stays or group homes? Or do we only collect this for people who actually live there, if there is still such a thing? Ttenbergen 15:40, 29 October 2025 (CDT)
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Log