Sent Report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
***Some of the sites were using them as a list to keep batch numbers organized and also to know which ones to delete after sending. | ***Some of the sites were using them as a list to keep batch numbers organized and also to know which ones to delete after sending. | ||
****The status report is not printed out but allows us to indicate why the patient file was not sent ie:chart in medical records as patient discharged/deceased, awaiting pathology or lab results, etc. This way Pagasa and Julie know the reason for the delay. As far as the send report goes , it allows for faster retrieval of a patient's info using our hard copies kept on file (since the e-file is deleted once sent)as opposed to pulling a chart from Medical Records.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 11:59, 24 August 2010 (CDT) | ****The status report is not printed out but allows us to indicate why the patient file was not sent ie:chart in medical records as patient discharged/deceased, awaiting pathology or lab results, etc. This way Pagasa and Julie know the reason for the delay. As far as the send report goes , it allows for faster retrieval of a patient's info using our hard copies kept on file (since the e-file is deleted once sent)as opposed to pulling a chart from Medical Records.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 11:59, 24 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
*****OAKS does not have a printer connected to the laptop. The status report was never printed when there was a printer-for the same reasons cited by Con. As for the sent report; when there was a printer a copy of the sent report was printed (one sent to Pagasa with Tiss sheets and one for records here). I now write out the list of sent records for each batch to keep on record. OAKS does not collect on paper; so the chart would have to be accessed from medical records to obtain any information.--[[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 09:07, 25 August 2010 (CDT) | |||
==GRA_Med== | ==GRA_Med== | ||
Hi Trish, | Hi Trish, | ||