Notes field: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
***I think it is very appropriate to put things that are outside the norm in the note field.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 08:16, 4 November 2010 (CDT) | ***I think it is very appropriate to put things that are outside the norm in the note field.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 08:16, 4 November 2010 (CDT) | ||
****I think it would reduce emails and pulling charts if the extreme value or outlier was confirmed in the note field prior to sending. Outliers that are entered without a note would of course require follow-up.[[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 19:11, 4 November 2010 (CDT) | ****I think it would reduce emails and pulling charts if the extreme value or outlier was confirmed in the note field prior to sending. Outliers that are entered without a note would of course require follow-up.[[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 19:11, 4 November 2010 (CDT) | ||
==Apache secondary upper and lower limits== | |||
****for APACHE, we are going to put "some" other upper and lower limits in Access so that Access will ask a collector, before sending, to "verify" that the value entered is correct even though it outside the norm. Julie is going to look at the database and advise what these limits will be. We are trying to reduce some of the questions that Pagasa has to ask collectors about odd APACHE values, values that are "possible" but not very "common". | ****for APACHE, we are going to put "some" other upper and lower limits in Access so that Access will ask a collector, before sending, to "verify" that the value entered is correct even though it outside the norm. Julie is going to look at the database and advise what these limits will be. We are trying to reduce some of the questions that Pagasa has to ask collectors about odd APACHE values, values that are "possible" but not very "common". | ||
****Example, if WBC is recorded as 150 or > then Access will ask you if you are certain that value is correct. You will have the chance to "correct it" or "accept" it as correct. Pagasa will no longer have ask collectors about these "uncommon" values. If they have passed through to her, it is understood that Access has already made the collector "verified" that the uncommon value is correct before it was sent in.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:56, 5 November 2010 (CDT) | ****Example, if WBC is recorded as 150 or > then Access will ask you if you are certain that value is correct. You will have the chance to "correct it" or "accept" it as correct. Pagasa will no longer have ask collectors about these "uncommon" values. If they have passed through to her, it is understood that Access has already made the collector "verified" that the uncommon value is correct before it was sent in.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:56, 5 November 2010 (CDT) | ||