Pharmacy collection: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
******** Yes. -- [[User:Fschumacher|Fred Schumacher]] 08:48, 2012 October 15 (CDT) | ******** Yes. -- [[User:Fschumacher|Fred Schumacher]] 08:48, 2012 October 15 (CDT) | ||
*********I prefer the format, as long as we still have the "hover" feature and all the drugs are on one page with a differentiation for the ones that only require a yes, then I much prefer this. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 08:49, 2012 October 16 (CDT) | *********I prefer the format, as long as we still have the "hover" feature and all the drugs are on one page with a differentiation for the ones that only require a yes, then I much prefer this. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 08:49, 2012 October 16 (CDT) | ||
Could we go back to 2 lines for the drugs please? Top line could be for the drugs requiring "days numbered" and the lower line for the "yes/no" drugs or reverse this order if the drugs requiring numbers of days would benefit from additional space for more entry days. This way we could have the drug headings slanted like they were before. I do not think the alphabetical listing of drugs is appropriate as there are different names within each category. I would like to see drugs grouped, e.g. all vasoactive categories lumped, all antibiotic categories together, etc. Thanks | |||
=== alphabetical vs old order of drugs === | === alphabetical vs old order of drugs === | ||