New Pharmacy collection Survey January 7, 2013: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* OAK - I find the new collection less time consuming. The new format is excellent. I have no issues.-[[User: Lpruden2 | Lorri Pruden]]-Jan 7.13
* OAK - I find the new collection less time consuming. The new format is excellent. I have no issues.-[[User: Lpruden2 | Lorri Pruden]]-Jan 7.13


*CON - I think that it is easier at my site than the previous counting of syringes for inotropes, amiodarone propofol, etc..[[User: Mlaporte | Marie Laporte]]. Jan 4.13
Thanks
Marie




Line 11: Line 16:


=== Concerns ===
=== Concerns ===
*HSC-Marie Laporte - Since she picks up shift at HSC in MICU opinion is this: Collection at HSC MICU seems to be more challenging; perhaps due to the acuity, complexity of the patients requiring more drugs, some which are used infrequently and therefore less familiar.[[User: Mlaporte | Marie Laporte]]. Jan 4.13





Revision as of 11:18, 7 January 2013

Pharmacy collection Survey January 7, 2013 I need some feedback in regards to how the pharmacy collection is going in your area? I would like to take your feedback back to Steering meeting on Monday January 7.13. Any issues, challenges, difficulties? Is it easier to use with the changes made?

Pros

  • OAK - I find the new collection less time consuming. The new format is excellent. I have no issues.- Lorri Pruden-Jan 7.13
  • CON - I think that it is easier at my site than the previous counting of syringes for inotropes, amiodarone propofol, etc.. Marie Laporte. Jan 4.13


Thanks Marie



Concerns

  • HSC-Marie Laporte - Since she picks up shift at HSC in MICU opinion is this: Collection at HSC MICU seems to be more challenging; perhaps due to the acuity, complexity of the patients requiring more drugs, some which are used infrequently and therefore less familiar. Marie Laporte. Jan 4.13