VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: Difference between revisions

TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
'''IF''' a patient has been on a device to assist respiration (ventilator) either continuously or intermittently through a tracheostomy or endotracheal tube (ETT) for at least '''48 hours''' while in a ICU unit '''before onset of infection, or new infection.'''  
'''IF''' a patient has been on a device to assist respiration (ventilator) either continuously or intermittently through a tracheostomy or endotracheal tube (ETT) for at least '''48 hours''' while in a ICU unit '''before onset of infection, or new infection.'''  
*Keep in mind transfers between ICU's, in that a patient could aready have been on a ventilator for 48 hrs or more prior to transferring into to your ICU.  
*Keep in mind transfers between ICU's, in that a patient could aready have been on a ventilator for 48 hrs or more prior to transferring into to your ICU.  
**If patient is transfered in from another ICU and has met the criteria of VAP including +ve sputum in '''less than 48 hrs or more''' while in your ICU unit, then the credit for the VAP should go to previous ICU.
**If patient is transfered in from another ICU and has met the criteria of VAP including +ve sputum in '''less than 48 hrs''' while in your ICU unit, then the credit for the VAP should go to previous ICU.
*If a patient had a CAP or HAP previously during the same admission and then develops pneumonia again, meeting the VAP criteria, it is only a VAP if it is a new organism.  If it is the same original organism, then the CAP or HAP has not completely been resolved.  Do not code these as a VAP.   
*If a patient had a CAP or HAP previously during the same admission and then develops pneumonia again, meeting the VAP criteria, it is only a VAP if it is a new organism.  If it is the same original organism, then the CAP or HAP has not completely been resolved.  Do not code these as a VAP.