Change Priorities: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Prioritized List of Changes== | == Prioritized List of Changes== | ||
Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit. | Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit. | ||
#L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter. For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way. Example: filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different. Review with Pagasa. Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter. Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick. I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | #L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter. For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way. Example: filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different. Review with Pagasa. Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter. Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick. I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | ||
# P_Outstanding_Admits would like the Incompletes with NO discharge date.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:54, 2014 April 25 (CDT) | # P_Outstanding_Admits would like the Incompletes with NO discharge date.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:54, 2014 April 25 (CDT) | ||
| Line 27: | Line 21: | ||
# address [[TMSX MedTMS to Centralized go-live]] | # address [[TMSX MedTMS to Centralized go-live]] | ||
#* consolidate and re-link that article | #* consolidate and re-link that article | ||
==likely fixed, please delete as confirmed == | |||
#[[Admit Type for APACHE II]]. The [[Centralized import from Ed.mdb]] possible conversion problem. Tina needs to check the coding of elective surgery, emergent surgery, medical. Imported, data not matching what is in Ed. Julie could advise further. | |||
#*The Elective Surgery (ES) of ED’s and the Centralized are still interchanged. See link. The Admit_TYPE categories are also shown based on the definition in wiki (http://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php/Admit_Type_for_APACHE_II ) and they are not matching in ED’s and Centralized. [[Julie Mojica]]. | |||
#Centralized - the diagnosis code for ACUTE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (TASK) should be changed from 1003201 to 100301. [[Julie Mojica]] as per email sent April 30.14. | |||
# ED’s has 8 '''missing''' CH data (due to missing APACHE elements – same with ES)[[Chronic Health APACHE]]. Centralized_data - assigns data to the missing 8 cases. These should have been treated as MISSING in the '''centralized data'''. [[Julie Mojica]]as per email sent: April 30.14. | |||
#Updated Apache scoring in CCMDB.mdb, still need to import to Centralized front end | |||
#[[Bug - Incomplete patients are being set to "sent" in Centralized data.mdb]] - likely fixed | |||
== To do before go-life == | == To do before go-life == | ||