Change Priorities: Difference between revisions

TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
== Prioritized List of Changes==
== Prioritized List of Changes==
Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit.
Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit.
#[[Centralized import from Ed.mdb]] - not sure if copy on X dated May 5.14, you had used the most current version to work on update with fixes.  I ran the importer last evening which included Julie task.xls.  L_task is showing blanks and L_DX is the missing tasks.
#[[Centralized import from Ed.mdb]] - not sure if copy on X dated May 5.14, you had used the most current version to work on update with fixes.  I ran the importer last evening which included Julie task.xls.  L_task is showing blanks and L_DX is the missing tasks. Should be only things we still had issues with was CH and Elective Surgery fields for importer, so lots of other weird things showing up.  Can review with Julie when you are in.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:20, 2014 May 7 (CDT)
#I am wondering is there is an issue with version controlling for both centralized front end and centralized import from Eds.  I noted today that in the s_admitdischarge table [[Grace Nursing Home Ward]] (nursing home GRA) is missing from centralized front end. I added it back in on version on X.  Let me know what you think may be going on.  Note: It had been added to master on X on April 10.14. - [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 15:45, 2014 May 6 (CDT)
#I am wondering is there is an issue with version controlling for both centralized front end and centralized import from Eds.  I noted today that in the s_admitdischarge table [[Grace Nursing Home Ward]] (nursing home GRA) is missing from centralized front end. I added it back in on version on X.  Let me know what you think may be going on.  Note: It had been added to master on X on April 10.14 and it was added to this list to make sure you update. - [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 15:45, 2014 May 6 (CDT)
#L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter.  For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way.  Example:  filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different.  Review with Pagasa.  Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter.  Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick.  I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT)
#L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter.  For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way.  Example:  filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different.  Review with Pagasa.  Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter.  Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick.  I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT)
#* catch me when I am in. Ttenbergen 20:07, 2014 May 1 (CDT)   
#* catch me when I am in. Ttenbergen 20:07, 2014 May 1 (CDT)