Created Variables: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Testing... == | == Testing... == | ||
Julie/Trish, let's track testing information for created_variables here... {{discussion}} | Julie/Trish, let's track testing information for created_variables here... {{discussion}} | ||
*“Transfer_Delay must be blanks instead of large negative values” | |||
**Got it, I’ll fix that. Well, maybe we should decide if we want to keep to Ed’s std for missing transfer time. I could import/change the actual …3000… dates to nulls, I think. Should I try to change the actual data? That would also make it consistent with how new data will arrive. | |||
***Sure, I agree that we change those dummy dates to null. | |||
****I have created update query “1use_only_update_3000_transfer_dates_to_null” in centralized_front_end to update all records in centralized_data.mdb that have a 3000 transfer date and their corresponding transfer times to null. Since this will change much data it should probably be run by Pagasa on a master version of the data after creating a specific backup of the data. Trish, could you please coordinate with Pagasa once the newest front end that includes this is rolled out? | |||
*Is 1/1/3000 9:45 your DEFAULT transf ready date time? | |||
**It’s not mine, it’s how it shows in Ed’s data when I import it. | |||
***OK, I am just surprise that there is time – I thought they are all zeroes. | |||
****I just tried to find a record that has that transfer date time combination and can’t. Could you provide a D_ID? | |||
===Calculation error due to dummy year and dummy times from blanks=== | ===Calculation error due to dummy year and dummy times from blanks=== | ||