ARI: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* I don't think that just having a creatinine of >250 should automatically mean ARI. This could be the patient's baseline and therefore is a chronic issue. My opinion is to only use the rule of >100 mmol over baseline over 24 hours for '''acute''' renal insufficiency (without dialysis), or use ATN if this is documented. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:13, 2014 October 8 (CDT) | * I don't think that just having a creatinine of >250 should automatically mean ARI. This could be the patient's baseline and therefore is a chronic issue. My opinion is to only use the rule of >100 mmol over baseline over 24 hours for '''acute''' renal insufficiency (without dialysis), or use ATN if this is documented. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:13, 2014 October 8 (CDT) | ||
** Are we to change what we have being doing for over 10 years ?--[[User:PStein|PStein]] 09:54, 2014 October 15 (CDT) | ** Are we to change what we have being doing for over 10 years ?--[[User:PStein|PStein]] 09:54, 2014 October 15 (CDT) | ||
** I am just putting my opinion here, if any changes are done they will have to go through the task group first.--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 11:28, 2014 October 15 (CDT) | |||
== {{Data Integrity Checks}} == | == {{Data Integrity Checks}} == | ||
There are a number of coding rules related to renal diagnoses, centralized info about them is in [[Renal Coding Considerations]]. | There are a number of coding rules related to renal diagnoses, centralized info about them is in [[Renal Coding Considerations]]. | ||