ACP-C: Difference between revisions

Line 9:

*[http://www.wrha.mb.ca/professionals/acp/index.php WRHA ACP C]

== ~~Discussion~~ ==

== What - ACP status - collection changes in discussions only - not active yet ==

QI TEAM, Kendiss Olafson etc. have asked if database team could collect ACP status at admission.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:12, 2015 May 29 (CDT)

*Collecting ACP status at '''admission and discharge'''

*ACP C

*ACP UK (no documented ACP on the chart)

Line 17:

Line 18:

*ACP M+ (no cardiac resuss but accepting intubation)

*ACP M- (no resuss/no intubation)

**~~(If~~ ACP M is just ~~written~~ with no qualifiers ~~then one~~ would ~~classify~~ as ACP M-. ~~Since a significant proportion of patient do want intubation but do not want CPR~~, ~~I do think it is useful to distinguish~~)~~. Kendiss.~~

**''IF ACP status is documented as NO CPR but willing to accept intubations then the patient would be ACP M+ IF ACP status is document as NO CPR and NO intubation then the patient would be ACP M- IF ACP status is just documented as ACP M OR NO CPR with other qualifiers than patient would be classified as ACP M-''.--Kendiss. June, 23.15.

*Collecting ACP status at admission and discharge would allow us to follow:

==Where==

TMP file

==Start date==

None yet. Still in discussion.-- [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:00, 2015 June 23 (CDT)

== Purpose: would allow QI team to follow:==

**-% of patient with documented ACP during ICU

**-Level of care at both admission and discharge

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *[http://www.wrha.mb.ca/professionals/acp/index.php WRHA ACP C]
-== Discussion ==
+== What - ACP status - collection changes in discussions only - not active yet ==
 {{Potential  Change}}
 QI TEAM, Kendiss Olafson etc.  have asked if database team could collect ACP status at admission.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:12, 2015 May 29 (CDT)
+*Collecting ACP status at '''admission and discharge'''
 *ACP C
 *ACP UK (no documented ACP on the chart)
@@ Line 17: / Line 18: @@
 *ACP M+ (no cardiac resuss but accepting intubation)
 *ACP M- (no resuss/no intubation)
-**(If ACP M is just written with no qualifiers then one would classify as ACP M-.  Since a significant proportion of patient do want intubation but do not want CPR, I do think it is useful to distinguish). Kendiss.
+**''IF ACP status is documented as NO CPR but willing to accept intubations then the patient would be ACP M+ IF ACP status is document as NO CPR and NO intubation then the patient would be ACP M- IF ACP status is just documented as ACP M  OR  NO CPR with other qualifiers than patient would be classified as ACP M-''.--Kendiss. June, 23.15.
-*Collecting ACP status at admission and discharge would allow us to follow:
+==Where==
+TMP file
+==Start date==
+None yet.  Still in discussion.-- [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:00, 2015 June 23 (CDT)
+== Purpose:  would allow QI team to follow:==
 **-% of patient with documented ACP during ICU
 **-Level of care at both admission and discharge