ACP Status Collection in ICU: Difference between revisions
→Data use / Reporting and Analysis: adding the new project names |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=== If ACP-M is documented without +/- === | === If ACP-M is documented without +/- === | ||
If ACP M is just written with no qualifiers then one would classify as ACP M-. | If ACP M is just written with no qualifiers then one would classify as ACP M-. | ||
==Question== | |||
*Just wondering if there is a reason that there are 2 pre-populated entries for ACP source in CCMDB?? Most patient will only have one entry for source and one for status so we frequently have to delete the second entry. I think it would be easier to just pre-populate one entry of each (status and source) and then if there are more than one, we can just add it. This is my opinion. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 12:25, 2016 May 19 (CDT) | |||
== WRHA guidelines / forms == | == WRHA guidelines / forms == | ||