CVA-Cerebral Vascular Accident: Difference between revisions

Line 36:

* ''50508 - CVA-Brainstem'' is really the same as code 504. This was an unintended double code that crept into list ages ago.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:05, 2012 July 12 (CDT)

** {{discussion}} should we delete one of them from the drop-down? if so, please add to [[Requested CCMDB changes for the next version]][[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 September 13 (CDT)Ttenbergen

~~===Sept 14.12 Survey===~~

~~QUESTION:~~

~~OLD lacunar infarcts~~

~~Where do you code incidental find of from CT: OLD lacunar infarct~~

*VIC ICU & Med – 2/2 staff replied

**Comorbid DX

*CON ICU – 1/1 staff replied

**Comorbid DX

*STB ICU & Med – 2 staff out of 5 replied - 3 awaiting reply

**Comorbid DX

*** waiting for reply from: Debbie, Laura (vacation), Marla.-[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] ([[User talk:TOstryzniuk|talk]]) 18:29, 2012 September 17 (CDT)

*HSC ICU & Med – 3 of 6 staff replied – 3 awaiting reply

**Comorbid DX – only in admit if it is a new CVA

**waiting for reply from: Joyce,Fran, Pat.-[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] ([[User talk:TOstryzniuk|talk]]) 18:29, 2012 September 17 (CDT)

*OAK ICU – 1/1 staff replied

**Comorbid DX

*GRA ICU & Med – 3/3 staff replied

**Comorbid DX unless DX as acute, then in admit

* What is the outcome of this survey, i.e where should things be coded? Ttenbergen 11:04, 2013 January 21 (EST) {{discussion}}

== Legacy ==

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 * ''50508 - CVA-Brainstem'' is really the same as code 504. This was an unintended double code that crept into list ages ago.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:05, 2012 July 12 (CDT)
 ** {{discussion}} should we delete one of them from the drop-down? if so, please add to [[Requested CCMDB changes for the next version]][[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 September 13 (CDT)Ttenbergen
-===Sept 14.12 Survey===
-QUESTION:
-OLD  lacunar infarcts
-Where do you code incidental find of from CT:  OLD lacunar infarct
-*VIC ICU & Med – 2/2 staff replied
-**Comorbid DX
-*CON ICU – 1/1 staff replied
-**Comorbid DX
-*STB ICU & Med – 2 staff out of 5 replied  - 3 awaiting reply
-**Comorbid DX
-*** waiting for reply from: Debbie, Laura (vacation), Marla.-[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] ([[User talk:TOstryzniuk|talk]]) 18:29, 2012 September 17 (CDT)
-*HSC ICU & Med – 3 of 6 staff replied – 3 awaiting reply
-**Comorbid DX – only in admit if it is a new CVA
-**waiting for reply from: Joyce,Fran, Pat.-[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] ([[User talk:TOstryzniuk|talk]]) 18:29, 2012 September 17 (CDT)
-*OAK ICU – 1/1 staff replied
-**Comorbid DX
-*GRA ICU & Med – 3/3 staff replied
-**Comorbid DX unless DX as acute, then in admit
-* What is the outcome of this survey, i.e where should things be coded? Ttenbergen 11:04, 2013 January 21 (EST) {{discussion}}
 == Legacy ==