BRR: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:By marking BRR or BRX for all with DX of 100-2, collectors will have verified at the time of collection that they did not miss marking Var 2, and this will reduce the query's that gets send back for double checking.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 21:46, 18 March 2009 (CDT) | :By marking BRR or BRX for all with DX of 100-2, collectors will have verified at the time of collection that they did not miss marking Var 2, and this will reduce the query's that gets send back for double checking.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 21:46, 18 March 2009 (CDT) | ||
*Go here to see: [[http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wikis/ccmdb/index.php/CCMDB.mdb_Change_Log_2009#March_19.2C_2009 | *Go here to see: [[http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wikis/ccmdb/index.php/CCMDB.mdb_Change_Log_2009#March_19.2C_2009 rolled out change on March 19.09]]. | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
*[[http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wikis/ccmdb/index.php/CCMDB.mdb_Change_Log_2009#BRR.2C_XBR_.26_T6 CHANGE REQUEST LOG 2009 for CCMDB.mdb and for Data cleaner]]--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:03, 28 January 2009 (CST). | |||
**Not sure where it went from the above mentioned link, but rule is now here in this article. Tina you can take this discussion out of this article when you have dealt with it on the request for change log 2009. I think you have in the newer version of ACCESS but it has not been tested. --[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:37, 19 March 2009 (CDT) | **Not sure where it went from the above mentioned link, but rule is now here in this article. Tina you can take this discussion out of this article when you have dealt with it on the request for change log 2009. I think you have in the newer version of ACCESS but it has not been tested. --[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:37, 19 March 2009 (CDT) | ||