Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===March 2.09-NO LABS and NO Pharmacy=== | ===March 2.09-NO LABS and NO Pharmacy=== | ||
*'''CHANGE Suggestion''': next ACCESS version there should be 2 separate check boxes for NO lab and NO Pharm [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:29, 2 March 2009 (CST) | *'''CHANGE Suggestion''': next ACCESS version there should be 2 separate check boxes for NO lab and NO Pharm [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:29, 2 March 2009 (CST) | ||
*'''PROBLEM''': there are a few patients who do not have any labs & pharmacy data from the items we are tracking. ACCESS will not allow a collector to SEND if there is no data in '''BOTH''' LAB and PHARM. One site's workaround is to put EKG into lab field for the sole purpose of getting past this ACCESS restriction. This is not an acceptable workaround.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:29, 2 March 2009 (CST) | |||
**'''March 30, 2009'''-Hi Trish, We had the same issue with comorbids, and what we did was add a comorbid entry that says “no comorbids”. We then made Access deal with stripping that out. I think this would be better than adding a checkbox. If you add this to the requested changes” I’ll put it in. Tina | **'''March 30, 2009'''-Hi Trish, We had the same issue with comorbids, and what we did was add a comorbid entry that says “no comorbids”. We then made Access deal with stripping that out. I think this would be better than adding a checkbox. If you add this to the requested changes” I’ll put it in. Tina | ||
***sounds good. Go for it.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:55, 30 March 2009 (CDT) | ***sounds good. Go for it.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:55, 30 March 2009 (CDT) | ||
=== Checks and Updates === | === Checks and Updates === | ||