2020-03 HSC COVID unit transition: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (→H5 (old D5)) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Transition plan == | == Transition plan == | ||
Due to the original transition plan duplicate records were created: | |||
* one with the the original, pre-covid location (only renamed), and negative Pat_ID | |||
* one with the future location, and negative Pat_ID | |||
The plan was chagned as follows. | |||
=== collector instructions === | |||
# delete the duplicate record with the positive Pat_ID, and keep the one with the negative Pat_ID | |||
# change the [[Service/Location]] of the record to the new location (ie to [[HSC_WRS3]] resp [[HSC_D5]] ) | |||
# enter the actual location as part of [[Boarding Loc]]: | |||
#* for patients who had no location borrowing during transition: | |||
#** change the "no borrow" line to "HSC_D5_P", resp "HSC_D4_P" | |||
#** add a line for "HSC - Home medicine ward" with the time that the patient was actually moved | |||
#* if there were patients who actually were in a borrow location during the transition, let's talk about how we would enter those | |||
{{Collapsable | |||
| always= original plan, keep until fully backed out, but THIS IS NOT HOW WE WILL DO IT | |||
| full= | |||
Tina will pull data from the D4 and D5 laptops and collectors will need to do a [[CCMDB data.mdb restore from Regional Server]] before collection. | Tina will pull data from the D4 and D5 laptops and collectors will need to do a [[CCMDB data.mdb restore from Regional Server]] before collection. | ||
* Old D5 laptop ([[Laptop identifier]] H5) will need to do this first thing on the morning of Thursday, March 19 | * Old D5 laptop ([[Laptop identifier]] H5) will need to do this first thing on the morning of Thursday, March 19 | ||
Line 48: | Line 65: | ||
=== Why not do this with one entry rather than 2? === | === Why not do this with one entry rather than 2? === | ||
We could have had one entry, started at old location and then ended at new location. The transition might have been quite prolonged since a pt may have been on ward for long time, and might stay there for long time, especially with D5 population. We would have been in a transition status for months. Possibly longer than this new arrangement will stay. With the current dynamic state, best to have a transition we can complete in a predictable time frame. | We could have had one entry, started at old location and then ended at new location. The transition might have been quite prolonged since a pt may have been on ward for long time, and might stay there for long time, especially with D5 population. We would have been in a transition status for months. Possibly longer than this new arrangement will stay. With the current dynamic state, best to have a transition we can complete in a predictable time frame. | ||
}} | |||
== Reporting == | == Reporting == |
Revision as of 12:51, 2020 March 24
This page is about the transition of collection units at HSC to accommodate the new COVID unit.
Background
- Thursday March 19.20 – patients in HSC_D5_Pre_COVID will be moving to HSC_WRS3 (Level 3 of 735 Notre Dame Ave. old womens Hosp)
- Friday March 20.20 – patients in HSC_D4_pre_COVID will be moving to HSC D5
- Friday March 20.20 - D4 will be the new COVID-19 ward (HSC_D4_COVID ?)
HSC_D4_COVID
|
Temporary naming
- changed names of the following in s_dispo table because the longer version was breaking sending:
How will we identify these patients in EPR
EPR reports should work for the new locations as usual.
Transition plan
Due to the original transition plan duplicate records were created:
- one with the the original, pre-covid location (only renamed), and negative Pat_ID
- one with the future location, and negative Pat_ID
The plan was chagned as follows.
collector instructions
- delete the duplicate record with the positive Pat_ID, and keep the one with the negative Pat_ID
- change the Service/Location of the record to the new location (ie to HSC_WRS3 resp HSC_D5 )
- enter the actual location as part of Boarding Loc:
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
- change the "no borrow" line to "HSC_D5_P", resp "HSC_D4_P"
- add a line for "HSC - Home medicine ward" with the time that the patient was actually moved
- if there were patients who actually were in a borrow location during the transition, let's talk about how we would enter those
- for patients who had no location borrowing during transition:
original plan, keep until fully backed out, but THIS IS NOT HOW WE WILL DO IT | ||
Tina will pull data from the D4 and D5 laptops and collectors will need to do a CCMDB data.mdb restore from Regional Server before collection.
Tina will duplicate all records for units D4 and D5 that don't have a Dispo_DtTm. The Service/Location and Serial number sequences will be as follows. H5 (old D5)
H4 (old D4)
Collector will set the Dispo_DtTm and Arrive_DtTm to official transition time, doesn't so much matter what they use but should be consistent in the two records. Collectors will continue the same serial pool they used for the old Service/Location at the new one. That way they can just up the count from where they were. We will not need to add _a, _b, _d to the new locations because including the laptop identifier in D_ID takes care of that. Why not do this with one entry rather than 2?We could have had one entry, started at old location and then ended at new location. The transition might have been quite prolonged since a pt may have been on ward for long time, and might stay there for long time, especially with D5 population. We would have been in a transition status for months. Possibly longer than this new arrangement will stay. With the current dynamic state, best to have a transition we can complete in a predictable time frame. |
Reporting
Med reporting is by ward and combined. service location D5 before March 19 and WRS3N can be together.
Cross checks
|
|
Related articles
Related articles: |