2020-03 HSC COVID unit transition: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) m (→Background) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
* Thursday March 1.20 – patients in [[HSC_D5]] will be moving to [[HSC_WRS3]] ( | * '''Thursday March 1.20''' – patients in [[HSC_D5]] will be moving to [[HSC_WRS3]] (Level 3 of 735 Notre Dame Ave. old womens Hosp) | ||
* Friday March 20.20 – patients in [[HSC D4]] will be moving to [[HSC D5]] | * '''Friday March 20.20''' – patients in [[HSC D4]] will be moving to [[HSC D5]] | ||
* Friday March 20 | * '''Friday March 20.20''' - '''D4''' will be the new COVID-19 ward ([[#HSC_D4_COVID]] ?) | ||
=== HSC_D4_COVID === | === HSC_D4_COVID === | ||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
*Will we collect there? Exposure should be limited, but how much would we be able to get off charts, and would that still be useful? If we want to collect there, we will likely need a new [[Service/Location]] [[HSC_D4_COVID]]. If we are going to consider collecting the COVID ward at all (from EPR, no exposure), let’s not do it on paper, let’s do it on a laptop. That way the data we can get without exposure is at least available for intermediate analysis. | *Will we collect there? Exposure should be limited, but how much would we be able to get off charts, and would that still be useful? If we want to collect there, we will likely need a new [[Service/Location]] [[HSC_D4_COVID]]. If we are going to consider collecting the COVID ward at all (from EPR, no exposure), let’s not do it on paper, let’s do it on a laptop. That way the data we can get without exposure is at least available for intermediate analysis. | ||
*2020-Mar-18: email sent to Renner, Lynch, Walker and Garland if there is expectation to gather info there for database, but it would be retropective, as I would no allow my staff into there fore this purpose.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:38, 2020 March 18 (CDT) }} | *2020-Mar-18: email sent to Renner, Lynch, Walker and Garland if there is expectation to gather info there for database, but it would be retropective, as I would no allow my staff into there fore this purpose.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:38, 2020 March 18 (CDT) }} | ||
== How will we identify these patients in EPR == | == How will we identify these patients in EPR == |
Revision as of 16:49, 2020 March 18
|
Background
- Thursday March 1.20 – patients in HSC_D5 will be moving to HSC_WRS3 (Level 3 of 735 Notre Dame Ave. old womens Hosp)
- Friday March 20.20 - D4 will be the new COVID-19 ward (#HSC_D4_COVID ?)
HSC_D4_COVID
|
How will we identify these patients in EPR
Transition plan
Tina will pull data from the D4 and D5 laptops and collectors will need to restore the data, instructions to come before collection on March 19.
Tina will duplicate all records for units D4 and D5 that don't have a Dispo_DtTm. The Service/Location and Serial number sequences will be as follows:
- for patients who currently have Service/Location HSC_D5:
- one copy will be HSC_D5_Pre_COVID, same Serial number as before, Dispo will be HSC_WRS3
- other copy will be HSC_WRS3, same Serial number as before, Previous Location will be HSC_D5_Pre_COVID
- (Previously completed/vetted patients in CFE with Service/Location HSC_D5 will be changed to HSC_D5_Pre_COVID, Serial numbers and D_IDs will not be changed.
- This will result in Orphans in Centralized data.mdb for these patients, Pagasa will need to delete those.
- for patients who currently have Service/Location HSC_D4:
- one copy will be HSC_D4, same Serial number as before, Dispo will be HSC_D5
- other copy will be HSC_D5, same Serial number as before, Previous Location will be HSC_D4
- (Previously completed/vetted patients in CFE with Service/Location HSC_D4 will require no change since, if we were to collect the new D4 it would be as HSC_D4_COVID .
- This will NOT result in Orphans in Centralized data.mdb for these patients, since the HSC_D4 entry remains
Collector will have to set the Dispo_DtTm to official transition time, doesn't so much matter what they use but should be consistent in the two records.
Collectors will continue the same serial pool they used for the old Service/Location at the new one. That way they can just up the count from where they were.
We will not need to add _a, _b, _d to the new locations because including the laptop identifier in D_ID takes care of that.
We might be able to get data from EPR Report directly, but not immediately
Why not do this with one entry rather than 2?
We could have had one entry, started at old location and then ended at new location. The transition might have been quite prolonged since a pt may have been on ward for long time, and might stay there for long time, especially with D5 population. We would have been in a transition status for months. Possibly longer than this new arrangement will stay. With the current dynamic state, best to have a transition we can complete in a predictable time frame.
Reporting
Med reporting is by ward and combined. service location D5 before March 19 and WRS3N can be together.
Cross checks
|
|
Related articles
Related articles: |