Admit DtTm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Admit DtTm is not as simple of a concept as it might seem, and it's definition and storage in our database has changed over time. This page gives some definitions and how we h...") |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{Discuss | [[Service tmp entry]] is not yet part of [[Minimal Data Set]]; I have flagged on that page how it needs to be include. | {{Discuss | [[Service tmp entry]] is not yet part of [[Minimal Data Set]]; I have flagged on that page how it needs to be include. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Discuss | We should be deliberate when we use this concept and when we instead use [[Boarding Loc]] dttm. If someone looks at a LOS for a unit they probably don't care about that pts service time elsewhere, right? So, again not sure if this is actually a useful concept. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:59, 2021 May 5 (CDT) }} | |||
== Relevance == | == Relevance == |
Revision as of 16:59, 2021 May 5
Admit DtTm is not as simple of a concept as it might seem, and it's definition and storage in our database has changed over time. This page gives some definitions and how we have implemented them.
Proposed definition
If Visit Admit DtTm > #2020-10-15# then earliest Service tmp entry DtTm in profile else if available, Accept DtTm, else if Arrive DtTm
Service tmp entry is not yet part of Minimal Data Set; I have flagged on that page how it needs to be include. |
We should be deliberate when we use this concept and when we instead use Boarding Loc dttm. If someone looks at a LOS for a unit they probably don't care about that pts service time elsewhere, right? So, again not sure if this is actually a useful concept. Ttenbergen 16:59, 2021 May 5 (CDT) |
Relevance
List of related concepts |
Also see "what links here" |