CFE Inline Integrity Checks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
{{DL| | {{DL| | ||
* Julie says she is seeing some [[Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry]] with same DtTm as their corresponding [[Boarding Loc]]. The way I read [[Transfer_Ready_DtTm_tmp_entry#Data_entry_instructions]] that should be impossible, ie becoming ready at the same time as arriving, no? [[query check_transfer_DtTm_during_admission]] would allow ''at'' BL but not before. Same for [[query check_Transfer_DtTm_after_paired_BL_and_before_later_BL]]. So right now we let BL | * Julie says she is seeing some [[Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry]] with same DtTm as their corresponding [[Boarding Loc]]. The way I read [[Transfer_Ready_DtTm_tmp_entry#Data_entry_instructions]] that should be impossible, ie becoming ready at the same time as arriving, no? [[query check_transfer_DtTm_during_admission]] would allow ''at'' BL but not before. Same for [[query check_Transfer_DtTm_after_paired_BL_and_before_later_BL]]. So right now we let BL equal to TR through, but we likely should not. Agree? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:56, 2022 August 10 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 2022 August 10
Pagasa edits in CFE, and right now there are no checks in place for typos in these edits.
When and how would these checks run?
Cross-checks in CCMDB are triggered by collectors checking the various "complete" boxes, but there is no equivalent to this in CFE, especially since Pagasa can legitimately edit tables directly or via query, so these checks would likely need to be triggered manually, likely between Quality Assurance queries in CFE and actually setting records to "vetted".
What sort of checks do we actually want?
|
|
|
|
Related articles
Related articles: |