Eliminating distinction between different ward types: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [[Template:Collection Location]] | * [[Template:Collection Location]] | ||
* [[LOS Medicine per hospital admission]] | * [[LOS Medicine per hospital admission]] | ||
* {{Discuss | who = Julie | any of Julie's [[Reporting]] that use this concept? }} | * {{Discuss | who = Julie | any of Julie's [[Reporting]] that use this concept? I no longer used the hierarchy level when computing transfer delays. I assume that if transfer ready datetime is present, DC follows the rule and they are included in the computation. In Medicine Report, there is no more tables showing teaching vs. non teaching. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 11:10, 2020 January 30 (CST) }} | ||
* [[Query check dispo lower acuity than location]] | * [[Query check dispo lower acuity than location]] | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 2020 January 30
We currently consider medicine wards as CTU, NTU and several other types.
Log
newest first
- 2019-10-08 emailed Julie and Trish to finally get this resolved. They are away for two weeks.
- Mar 6 Task meeting (item 3) - Discussed further what value a unit at start of admission would actually be, and whether it would be worth collecting
- Feb 25 Task meeting (item 5) - Allan had contacted the Medicine leaders with a suggestion of collecting a separate value for "unit type at admission" - the medicine people who had responded by this time were OK with this.
- after that: Julie identified that Medicine wants this data in reports
- July 12 Task Meeting (item 4): we decided to stop making this distinction.
Concepts affected by this
Various things are affected by this change, so listing them and making sure we are OK with all of them.
- Transfer_Ready_DtTm_field#Hierarchy_of_levels_of_care - will we treat _all_ wards the same after this?
- Transfer_Ready_DtTm_field - cross checks, we would need to update them
- CTU - if this will be no longer relevant we should delete it and clean up what links to it.
- NTU - if this will be no longer relevant we should delete it and clean up what links to it.
- Property:Collection Location Service Type - how would we group them in here? We'd need a new term, propose "ward"...
- GRA Medicine Collection Guide
- HSC Med nonteaching contingency beds
- S dispo table - the "center" field to some degree encodes this...
- site pages such as GRA N3 and all its counterparts
- Parked_in_ER#Data_use
- HSC Medicine Collection Guide
- Template:Collection Location
- LOS Medicine per hospital admission
any of Julie's Reporting that use this concept? I no longer used the hierarchy level when computing transfer delays. I assume that if transfer ready datetime is present, DC follows the rule and they are included in the computation. In Medicine Report, there is no more tables showing teaching vs. non teaching. --JMojica 11:10, 2020 January 30 (CST) |
CTU vs NTU - we decided at task that we wanted to eliminate the distinction. A lot of things are part of their network of information, so we will need to work out the details above before we can move ahead.
|
Related articles
These would be pages that would be affected by this...
Related articles: |