Function Dispo Chronological(): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Transfer vs (accept vs arrive) == | == Transfer vs (accept vs arrive) == | ||
{{Discuss | who = | {{Discuss | who = Task | question = | ||
* I just came across the error “Arrive_DtTm can't be greater than Transfer_Ready_DtTm.” in CCMDB. It made me wonder… I suppose that a TR could be before Arrive if it’s after Accept. | * I just came across the error “Arrive_DtTm can't be greater than Transfer_Ready_DtTm.” in CCMDB. It made me wonder… I suppose that a TR could be before Arrive if it’s after Accept. | ||
** First, Trish, do you think I am right about that? | ** First, Trish, do you think I am right about that? |
Revision as of 15:28, 2019 January 7
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Checks that the registry times are in a sensible chronological order. |
Related: | Arrive DtTm, Accept DtTm, Transfer Ready DtTm, Dispo DtTm |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | always |
App: | CCMDB.mdb |
Coding: | Function Dispo Chronological() |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | implemented |
Implementation Date: | 2016-05-25 |
Backlogged: | true |
The check will generate an error if:
- Arrive DtTm has to be before or equal to Accept DtTm
- Arrive DtTm has to be before or equal Transfer Ready DtTm
- Arrive DtTm has to be before Dispo DtTm
- Transfer Ready DtTm has to be before Dispo DtTm
- Dispo DtTm has to be before Now() / today
No checks on Visit Admit DtTm field since taken direct from EPR, so it is what it is.
Transfer vs (accept vs arrive)
Transfer time rule
Will want to reconcile Transfer time rule |