1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2025-05-29 7:32:12 PM |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Questions • Task Team |
| _pageID | Integer | 13,250 |
| _pageName | Page | JALT Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2025 |
| _pageTitle | String | JALT Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2025
|
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| who | Text | Allan |
| question | Wikitext | - Could you summarize what we would need to change from ICUotherService to get to this? It sounds similar. Ttenbergen 13:25, 17 March 2025 (CDT)
- in the example mentioned, the service is STB ICMS and flag in the tmp ICUotherService with item entry CICU under MICU service which is ICCS under ICMS service. the current list we have is clearer and less confusing than ICU other service- MICU. And when this patient is accepted to the STB ICMS as an ICMS patient, we continue the profile and the tmp ICUotherService will have a new line with entry MICU under MICU service. Such profile then will have part of ICMS service as an ICCS patient and as an ICMS patient. In the qtr report, this profile is included in the ICMS unit. However, a separate report if requested can be done if wanted to know the LOS of overflowed patients on borrowed service. --JMojica 17:30, 7 April 2025 (CDT)
|