Difference between revisions of "L ICD10 subform"

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(cleaned up some old questions, please re-flag if some of them were still an issue)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* [[Dx Priority]] - for sorting but also for grouping as [[Combined ICD10 codes]]
 
* [[Dx Priority]] - for sorting but also for grouping as [[Combined ICD10 codes]]
  
== 2018-11-24 colour changes to group types and priorities better ==
+
=== Colour changes to group types and priorities better ===
{{Discuss | who = All | question = * I changed this around a bit so there is a background that ties the types together on the left, and the priorities on the right. Also changed it so that the priorities use different colours than the types. It doesn't look particularly nice, but the point was to group things better. So, does it do that? If not, do you have a suggestion what would (ideally without taking up much more space). Also, yuck, even if it does the trick, how would we make it look a bit less awful? Please comment below. Ttenbergen 22:06, 2018 November 24 (CST) }}
+
There is a background colour that ties the types together on the left, and the priorities on the right. Priorities use different colours than the types.  
  
 
=== Comorbids in another tab? ===
 
=== Comorbids in another tab? ===
Line 30: Line 30:
 
*staff requested ICD10/CCI DX priority number column to be moved closer left instead of being on the far right of row.  Staff can advise where exactly that column would best be.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:59, 2018 September 21 (CDT)
 
*staff requested ICD10/CCI DX priority number column to be moved closer left instead of being on the far right of row.  Staff can advise where exactly that column would best be.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:59, 2018 September 21 (CDT)
 
** I moved that to the right, and toned the colouring in it way down; not sure if it's needed at all. What it does for now is make odd and even priorities a different colour, which means that USUALLY it will colour dxs with same priority the same colour, and different from their neighbour; however, that doesn't work when e.g. there is a P1 and P3 but no P2, or when there is a P1 admit and a P1 acquired right next to each other. I am open to other suggestions to help with this. Some people were saying no colour is needed at all for this... Ttenbergen 22:03, 2018 November 26 (CST)
 
** I moved that to the right, and toned the colouring in it way down; not sure if it's needed at all. What it does for now is make odd and even priorities a different colour, which means that USUALLY it will colour dxs with same priority the same colour, and different from their neighbour; however, that doesn't work when e.g. there is a P1 and P3 but no P2, or when there is a P1 admit and a P1 acquired right next to each other. I am open to other suggestions to help with this. Some people were saying no colour is needed at all for this... Ttenbergen 22:03, 2018 November 26 (CST)
 
=== sorting issues ===
 
{{Discussion}}
 
*Not sorting properly and adds to difficulties with longs lists. 
 
** I think that was fixed, if still an issue, pls comment here. Else I will take this part out in a week. Ttenbergen 22:22, 2018 November 24 (CST)
 
  
 
== Data storage ==
 
== Data storage ==

Latest revision as of 17:37, 2019 November 7

The L_ICD10 subform in the ICD10 tab of the Patient Viewer is used for ICD10 collection.

Form Elements

Header:

Body:

Colour changes to group types and priorities better

There is a background colour that ties the types together on the left, and the priorities on the right. Priorities use different colours than the types.

Comorbids in another tab?

Team meeting staff raised concerned about too many rows to scroll down through when comorbid are together with Admits and acquired.

  • One suggestion to put in separate tab? Tina to investigate further with staff and perhaps see if there are any options.
    • If they go on a different tab you have two places to look. How do people feel about them on the same page now that the background colour is different? Ttenbergen 22:22, 2018 November 24 (CST)

ICD10/CCI priority number column move

  • staff requested ICD10/CCI DX priority number column to be moved closer left instead of being on the far right of row. Staff can advise where exactly that column would best be.Trish Ostryzniuk 19:59, 2018 September 21 (CDT)
    • I moved that to the right, and toned the colouring in it way down; not sure if it's needed at all. What it does for now is make odd and even priorities a different colour, which means that USUALLY it will colour dxs with same priority the same colour, and different from their neighbour; however, that doesn't work when e.g. there is a P1 and P3 but no P2, or when there is a P1 admit and a P1 acquired right next to each other. I am open to other suggestions to help with this. Some people were saying no colour is needed at all for this... Ttenbergen 22:03, 2018 November 26 (CST)

Data storage

Data in this subform is stored in L_ICD10 table. Dropdowns depend on s_ICD10 table.

Related Articles

Related articles: