Lost/missing chart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{Discuss | | {{Discuss | | ||
* what should be the instruction for APACHE - the usual "enter normal if not available" or should they enter extremes or 0s, or leave blank? What will not mess with Julie's processes? | * what should be the instruction for APACHE - the usual "enter normal if not available" or should they enter extremes or 0s, or leave blank? What will not mess with Julie's processes? | ||
}} | ** I would rather have a missing APACHE Score when any of the APACHE elements are missing due to Lost or missing chart. Entry of zero for numeric or blank for character on any of the elements results to blank APACHE Score (but this refutes the guideline for APACHE Physiologic Not available). Normal values result to Zero APACHE Score (when age pts is zero). }} | ||
{{Collapsable | {{Collapsable | ||
| always= the following doesn't apply yet, waiting to confirm as of 2021-04-07 | | always= the following doesn't apply yet, waiting to confirm as of 2021-04-07 |
Revision as of 16:54, 2021 April 7
What qualifies a chart as missing/lost
A chart should be considered lost or missing and "written off" if...
Attempts to locate have failed
|
Deferral period has passed
|
Instructions for finishing off the profile
An profile for a missing chart might trigger CCMDB.accdb Data Integrity Checks, so it can't be sent the normal way and the following process applies instead.
Instructions for Collectors
- Try to enter all available info and to check the complete boxes; this will make sure that data is internally consistent as far as possible
- This includes any diagnostic imaging and procedure counts and results, lab results, etc
- Where you can not get past a cross check because data is not available, explain that in the Notes field
the following doesn't apply yet, waiting to confirm as of 2021-04-07 |
|
Instructions for Data Processor
|
Incomplete/lost profiles
Julie says Pagasa keeps a list of records for which this applies. Can we keep it here instead? If there are good reasons not to, can we link from here?
|
click expand to see list |
|
Related articles
Related articles: |