QA Infection VAP: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (m)
m (m)
Line 35: Line 35:
[[Category: L_TmpV2 Data]]
[[Category: L_TmpV2 Data]]
[[Category: QA]]
[[Category: QA]]
[[Category: All Projects ICU]]
[[Category: All Projects ICU only]]
[[Category: TISS28]]
[[Category: TISS28]]
[[Category: Pneumonia]]
[[Category: Pneumonia]]

Revision as of 19:08, 2016 November 3

The Critical Care QI Team is monitoring VAPs in the ICUs. This project is in collaboration with CCVMS which is a cross Canada ICU collaborative project.

Data Collection Instructions

For all ICU patients except STB_CICU & CCU:

If a patient
  • develops a Complication of VAP while in your unit
  • the VAP is newly acquired on your unit and not already reported at different unit
  • there is a positive culture (no positive culture, don't code)
then
  • Project: QAInf
  • Item: VAP
  • date_var: date (no time) positive sputum culture was sent to micro lab.

Don't use TMP as notes

Please do not enter this TMP until you have actually confirmed a DX of VAP exists. Use the Notes field on you laptop as a reminder if needed.

Patient from other ICU with Central Line and possibly VAP

If Patient already has a VAP present on admission to your unit:

  • in the admitting diagnosis field, enter VAP.
  • do not enter the DATE of positive culture in the Temp Studies field.

Template:Discussion I think what we really mean here is, don't enter into tmp at all, right? Or is it really just the date? Ttenbergen 19:04, 2016 November 3 (CDT)

  • if the patient is from another ICU in the city, email the collector at that site to check if VAP was captured as a complication at that site.

Dates

  • Start Date: Saturday August 22, 2009
  • End Date: NONE - Continued project with the CCVSM cross Canada Collaborative--TOstryzniuk 16:53, 4 October 2010 (CDT)

Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks

See QA Infection