Query check ICD10 trach dxs consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (→Log) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
* 2022-09-28 - definition tweaked | * 2022-09-28 - definition tweaked | ||
* 2022-02-10 - reviewed the proposed addition and have concerns, flagged for Julie | * 2022-02-10 - reviewed the proposed addition and have concerns, flagged for Julie | ||
* 2019-04-08 - removed [[Tracheostomy care]] (retired code) from this query; changed how it is structured altogether to test new rule | * 2019-04-08 - removed [[Tracheostomy care]] (retired code) from this query; changed how it is structured altogether to test new rule |
Revision as of 10:17, 2023 May 3
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | Tracheostomy related CCI and ICD10 codes must be consistent with each other. |
Related: | Tracheostomy, has one, Tracheostomy complication, hemorrhage from site, Tracheostomy complication, malfunction, Tracheostomy complication, NOS, Tracheostomy complication, tracheo-esophageal fistula, Trach Tube Present (TISS Item) |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | Query check_ICD10_trach_dxs_consistent |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | ready to implement |
Implementation Date: | 2019-01-22 |
Backlogged: | true |
- if any trach-implying dxs are present then pt must have at least one code that indicates that they have a trach :
- trach-implying dxs
- code that indicates that they have a trach
- CCI - Tracheostomy creation (1.GJ.77)
- ICD10 - Tracheostomy, has one (Z93.0)
- TISS - T23 - Trach Tube Present (TISS Item)
Log
- 2022-09-28 - definition tweaked
- 2022-02-10 - reviewed the proposed addition and have concerns, flagged for Julie
- 2019-04-08 - removed Tracheostomy care (retired code) from this query; changed how it is structured altogether to test new rule
- 2019-03-20 - previously this also required one of the above if "has one" was present, but that makes no sense, because one could be present without additional care requirements, so have taken that part out. Ttenbergen 12:45, 2019 March 20 (CDT)