Query check long transfer delay: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a check to ensure that patients with a long [[Transfer Delay]] are not errors. | This is a check to ensure that patients with a long [[Transfer Delay]] are not errors. | ||
Any patient with a transfer delay longer than the following limits will launch an error when the dispo tab checkbox is checked. Data collectors need to confirm if not an error and write in the notes box that the transfer ready date_time is correct. The [[Statistician]] will look at the notes when doing report about avoidable days. | |||
# ICU (MICU, SICU, CICU, CCU, ACCU) - 7 days | |||
# IICU - 14 days | |||
# CTU Med Wards - 21 days | |||
# NTU Med Wards - 42 days | |||
The following is still under discussion and not yet implemented! When done also update the cross check info in [[Transfer Delay]], [[Transfer Ready DtTm field]] and [[Dispo DtTm field]] | The following is still under discussion and not yet implemented! When done also update the cross check info in [[Transfer Delay]], [[Transfer Ready DtTm field]] and [[Dispo DtTm field]] | ||
{{discussion}} There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT) | {{discussion}} There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:43, 2018 July 31
This is a check to ensure that patients with a long Transfer Delay are not errors.
Any patient with a transfer delay longer than the following limits will launch an error when the dispo tab checkbox is checked. Data collectors need to confirm if not an error and write in the notes box that the transfer ready date_time is correct. The Statistician will look at the notes when doing report about avoidable days.
- ICU (MICU, SICU, CICU, CCU, ACCU) - 7 days
- IICU - 14 days
- CTU Med Wards - 21 days
- NTU Med Wards - 42 days
The following is still under discussion and not yet implemented! When done also update the cross check info in Transfer Delay, Transfer Ready DtTm field and Dispo DtTm field
Template:Discussion There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT)