Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "DiscussQuestion" with value " * what queries would get you to change a D_ID? We would want to cross-link them so they point to these instructions, and so these instructions can list them as cause. ". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

⧼showingresults⧽

View (previous 1,000 | next 1,000) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

     ( * what queries would get you to change a D_ID? We would want to cross-link them so they point to these instructions, and so these instructions can list them as cause. )
    • DSM Lab Extract  + ( * A possibility to change the current [[Chart]] entry to be the same with SH format (see [[#DSM Inclusion Criteria/ Process]] for reason why in details). )
    • ER Delay  + ( * I have re-updated [[Created_Variables_Common_maker_2021 query]]</br>* I have re-updated [[Created_Variables_Common_maker_2021 query]], for some reason the change I had made was not reflected in the master version. Ready to test. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:25, 2022 June 28 (CDT)</br>** emailed Tina some inconsistencies found in ER Delays Aug 15,2022. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:21, 2022 August 29 (CDT)</br>[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:21, 2022 August 29 (CDT) )
    • Query NDC Bad Postal Code  + ( * I think this is the process where you s</br>* I think this is the process where you said you are having problems with copy/pasting. Copy pasting isn't even mentioned here, so maybe update the process to show how you actually do this, so that someone like Sheila Rusnak would be able to follow the instructions. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:45, 2022 March 17 (CDT)</br>** Do you create that query each time? Would we be able to update the NDC query that finds these in the first place to include the info you need? We can discuss at our next meeting. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:23, 2022 March 17 (CDT)</br>*** Taking this off Pagasa's list for now, since if we can get this data from DSS we won't need to do this any more. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:36, 2022 March 24 (CDT)</br>[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:36, 2022 March 24 (CDT) )
    • "cannot open any more tables" in Access  + ( *After 24 rows, open and closed assigning</br>*After 24 rows, open and closed assigning Pseudo Phin an error message pop up then I cannot assign Phin anymore. I closed CFE then open then I am good to go again. The second time the error message pop up not 24 rows it less than 24 like 15 rows then it will show again the error message. [[User:PTorres|PTorres]] 16:09, 2022 June 14 (CDT)</br>** Is it the "cannot open..." error or the "enter parameter..." error you get at this point? Emailed Pagasa... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:49, 2022 November 16 (CST) </br>*** Still shows "cannot open "so I clicked ok then it says run time error 3014 cannot open any more tables. Closed the CFE then log back in.</br>*** After I continue assigning Pseudo Phin after 25 rows "cannot open" showed up again I clicked ok then error message shows again. Closed CFE then log back in.[[User:PTorres|PTorres]] 14:42, 2022 November 30 (CST)</br></br>**** Are you following the steps in [[Generating PseudoPHINs]] when this goes wrong? Which step in those instructions are you at when it stops responding and you need to restart the program? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:48, 2022 November 29 (CST)</br>*** Yes, I am. I am clicking and assigning the new Pseudo Phin and not moving. [[User:PTorres|PTorres]] 14:47, 2022 November 30 (CST)</br>[[User:PTorres|PTorres]] 14:47, 2022 November 30 (CST) )
    • Pneumonia, bacterial  +
    • Pneumonia, NOS  +
    • Pneumonia, viral  +
    • Hallucinogen, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Cocaine, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Benzodiazepine, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Tricyclic antidepressant, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Antidepressant drug NOS, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Psychiatric drug NOS, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Beta-blocker, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Anticoagulant, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Calcium channel blocker, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Cardiac/cardiovascular drug NOS, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Drug or biological substance/agent NOS, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Iatrogenic, complication of medical or surgical care NOS  +
    • Anesthetic gas, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Sedative or hypnotic, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Thrombolytic drug, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Antineoplastic/chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Neuromuscular blocker/paralytic, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Acetaminophen (tylenol, paracematol), overdose/toxicity  +
    • Aspirin or other salicylate or NSAID, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Hormone or hormone agonist NOS, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Antibiotic/antimicrobial, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Opioid/narcotic, overdose/toxicity  +
    • Query check CCI ICD10 Dialysis no Dx  + (Hey T we need to change the above PsychiatHey T we need to change the above Psychiatric drug NOS, adverse effect to overdose/toxicity, this was triggered by a profile Michelle was trying to complete where they dialyzed for this diagnosis but the error came up [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 14:35, 2024 April 23 (CDT)[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 14:35, 2024 April 23 (CDT))
    • Change of remaining location names from "our" names to EPR/Cognos names  + (JALT - Is there anything here we want to dJALT - Is there anything here we want to do before SF? Or that still needs to be done at all? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:42, 2023 July 6 (CDT)</br>* What happens to the ICU [[Previous Location]], [[Pre-admit Inpatient Institution]], [[Dispo]] or even [[Service Location]] - should they be changed too by the new COGNOS ICU locations? Example current STB_ACCU is SBGH-CCUO in COGNOS, STB_CICU is SBGH_ICCS, STB_MICU is SBGH_ICMS. Should the old labels remain? We need to think hard for its implications to queries of linking and/or matching tables before implementing any change. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:33, 2022 February 2 (CST) </br>** It would be nice to have this consistent, and yet you are correct that this would tie into a lot of things. I think the benefits of making it consistent win out, though especially when it comes to also thinking about this in terms of that metadata we discussed the other day. Even if we keep the (possibly identical) data in both s_tmp and s_dispo for now, we would then be able to use that metadata table for both. This would require thinking through the details. Julie, I think it only involves you and me, so maybe we should discuss at our wiki meetings? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:44, 2022 February 8 (CST)</br>*** Julie and Tina discussed: </br>:::* We use the 4 fields [[Previous Location]], [[Pre-admit Inpatient Institution]], [[Dispo]] and [[Service/Location]] also to map patient flow between laptops, and we very much don't use Cognos values for this (e.g. HSC_Med). We need to retain this ability to use the entries for linking but would also make them the same as Cognos where possible. So we need to keep our "own" values for this for locations where we collect. </br>:::* We decided to use manually split CC entries e.g. HSC_MICU vs HSC_SICU since Julie reports in those increments, ie it is hard to pull apart a stay in two ICU types if it is collected as one record. We don't want to lose that. </br>:::* We would still like to change these own values to the "modern" values where we use legacy terms, eg. STB ICMS vs STB MICU. As long as we make a clean transition between old and new, or change all old, that should not be a problem, but we need to account for it. </br>:::* We could use the Cognos values for all places where we don't collect, e.g. if a pt comes from Ward HSC_A1 and Cognos lists that as HSC-GA1, we could just enter that. However, for locations we don't collect we currently aggregate this to HSC_ward. Do we want the extra detail? It would be easier to enter but might be harder to interpret and possibly even harder to work with for collectors. </br>:::* If we want to keep our proprietary value for locations where we collect, and keep aggregate ones for locations where we don't collect, I am not sure which locations that then leaves where we would use the Cognos values? </br>*** Julie, do you agree to that summary? If so, there may be nothing to discuss with Lisa, since we will need to leave this as is. If I am missing something pls update and then pass on to Lisa for her take. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:56, 2022 March 23 (CDT) </br>**** agree. pass to lisa. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 15:27, 2022 June 8 (CDT)</br>*I think this is no longer an issue, unless we are looking to change how we collect this, which I am not in favor of [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:23, 2022 August 24 (CDT)</br>** Even though this is no longer an issue, we should keep the above 5 summary issues here for future reference. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:38, 2024 March 12 (CDT)[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:38, 2024 March 12 (CDT))
    • Visits to temporary locations  + (The instructions for a death that occurs iThe instructions for a death that occurs in a temporary location are not clear. As per above we are to code the dispo as died, so there wouldn't be a discharge to a temporary location and therefore no bedheld entry, I have a case of a patient that went to the OR from MICU and died in the OR. should the dispo be to the OR (Temporary location) or should it be the death date and time? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 09:55, 2024 April 23 (CDT)[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 09:55, 2024 April 23 (CDT))
    • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests, abnormal  +
    • Fecal occult blood test, positive  +
    • Hyperglycemia  +
    • Urinary organs/tract, diagnostic imaging, abnormal  +
    • Hemoglobinuria  +
    • Myoglobinuria  +
    • Brain,function test, abnormal  +
    • Red blood cell, abnormal shape or volume  +
    • Abnormal blood chemistry NOS  +
    • Skin, rash NOS  +
    • Toxicology, blood, opiates, positive  +
    • Proteinuria  +