Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "DiscussQuestion" with value "What would be used for non-surg wound infection? [[Soft Tissue Infection (includes Cellulitis)]]?". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

⧼showingresults⧽

View (previous 1,000 | next 1,000) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

     (What would be used for non-surg wound infection? [[Soft Tissue Infection (includes Cellulitis)]]?)
    • Query check CCI CXR vs LOS  + ( * Just came across this... the started qu</br>* Just came across this... the started query includes additional dxs now, as per [[#CCI collect count each]]. Does the proposed accepted count make sense for all the dxs? Your validation table was for CXR. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:50, 2023 May 3 (CDT)</br>** Did some checking on all 13 LAB Imaging from CCI picklist and found counts more than the LOS only in ECHO, AXR and CXR. Emailed Lisa and Pagasa March 14, 2024 to check if correct or not. Waiting for their feedbacks. In the email, I also propose another query (e.g. the counts per calendar day per patient must not be more than one) as alternative to the threshold limits LOS +- 3 STD shown below. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:55, 2024 March 18 (CDT) </br>*** That query is tighter and would therefore have more false positives. What does Lisa think about that? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:51, 2024 March 20 (CDT)</br>**** I made some limits per LOS group for CXR, AXR, ECHO and Blood gases and emailed the results to Tina and Lisa 3/25/2024 for discussion. ---[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:28, 2024 March 25 (CDT) </br>***** Further emails with Julie and Lisa about details. Discussed with Lisa who is reviewing some of the errors and will hold off until she is done. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:46, 2024 April 8 (CDT)</br>[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:46, 2024 April 8 (CDT) )
    • Pneumonia, viral  +
    • Pneumonia, bacterial  +
    • Pneumonia, NOS  +
    • Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, internal prosthetic device or implant or graft NOS  + (At our last TASK meeting the decision was At our last TASK meeting the decision was made to exclude spontaneous rupture of an ETT cuff or cuff leak, but we are wondering if this is correct based on what is listed in the includes section of this page and what is in [[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, internal orthopedic prosthetic device or implant or graft or bone device]] and [[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, cardiac or vascular prosthetic device or implant or graft, NOS]] [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:37, 2024 March 20 (CDT)[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:37, 2024 March 20 (CDT))
    • Myocardial infarction, acute (AMI), NOS  + (ICD 10 has this code for STEMI: '''2024 ICD 10 has this code for STEMI: </br>'''2024 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code I21.3''' </br>* ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction of unspecified site that includes transmural (Q wave) infarction</br></br>ICD 10 has this code for NSTEMI:</br></br>'''2024 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code I21.4''' </br>* Non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction that includes Nontransmural myocardial infarction NOS</br></br>Would it be less labor intensive for collectors to be able to use these codes instead of MI codes dependent upon development (or not) of Q waves as this is problematic to determine. Thank you, [[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 07:49, 2024 April 5 (CDT)</br>* I have added this to TASK, in 2019 ICD 10 did not have STEMI/NSTEMI codes, now in the 2024 version they do, I agree with Pam can we switch to the new codes? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 15:10, 2024 April 5 (CDT)[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 15:10, 2024 April 5 (CDT))
    • Template:ICD10 Guideline MRSA  + (z "It was decided that Allan with contact Dr. Embil after COVID is over and see if we can obtain this data from Infection Control. If so, we could import it into the database, and have our data collectors cease obtaining it." - did anything come of that?)