Template:ICD10 Guideline ESRD vs Acute renal failure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* In emails on 2022-06-23 Julie, Lisa and Tina decided to hold off on the change from the day before to review reasons why this was changed before. | * In emails on 2022-06-23 Julie, Lisa and Tina decided to hold off on the change from the day before to review reasons why this was changed before. | ||
* | * 2022-06-22 - At JALT meeting we discussed definition for query [[Check CRF vs ARF across multiple encounters]]; instructions were changed to no longer allow ARF to be collected at same time as CRF (I can't remember the reasons, can Julie or Lisa fill in?) | ||
* | * [[Task_Team_Meeting_-_Rolling_Agenda_and_Minutes_2020#ICU_Database_Task_Group_Meeting_-_January_23,_2020|2020-01-23 - Task(10)]] we discussed this at task: Some mild [[Chronic kidney disease (end-stage renal/kidney disease, ESRD), Stage 5, GFR LT 15]] cases can have AKI, so this rule no longer makes sense. | ||
* 2019-08-22 - Discussed in context of [[Check CRF vs ARF across multiple encounters]] and decided that, since people can come off dialysis, there might really be a new acute after having been on dialysis; messy so decided not to implement this | |||
* [[at some point]] we defined [[Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 1, GFR GT 90]] | * [[at some point]] we defined AKI by [[Template:ICD10 Guideline KDIGO Guidelines for Acute Renal Failure]] | ||
* [[at some point]] we defined [[Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 1, GFR GT 90]] rather than defining CRF by "on dialysis" as we had before | |||
* when we moved to ICD10 there was a desire to maintain that rule | * when we moved to ICD10 there was a desire to maintain that rule | ||
* pre/ancient: We used to not allow this in the old dx coding schema | * pre/ancient: We used to not allow this in the old dx coding schema |
Revision as of 16:04, 2022 June 23
This template contains info that is relevant to all the acute renal failure diagnoses.
To use:
- {{ICD10 Guideline ESRD vs Acute renal failure}}
ESRD vs Acute renal failure
- AND
- UNLESS the patient has had a renal transplant and the transplanted kidney was functioning (and thus can experience acute renal failure)
- But it is possible to code both one of the Acute Renal Failure/AKI codes AND one of the "lesser" CRF codes:
- Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 1, GFR GT 90
- Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 2, GFR 60-89
- Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 3, GFR 30-59
- Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 4, GFR 15-29
Background/History
This has been discussed repeatedly over time. Here is an attempt at a Chronology, newest first
- In emails on 2022-06-23 Julie, Lisa and Tina decided to hold off on the change from the day before to review reasons why this was changed before.
- 2022-06-22 - At JALT meeting we discussed definition for query Check CRF vs ARF across multiple encounters; instructions were changed to no longer allow ARF to be collected at same time as CRF (I can't remember the reasons, can Julie or Lisa fill in?)
- 2020-01-23 - Task(10) we discussed this at task: Some mild Chronic kidney disease (end-stage renal/kidney disease, ESRD), Stage 5, GFR LT 15 cases can have AKI, so this rule no longer makes sense.
- 2019-08-22 - Discussed in context of Check CRF vs ARF across multiple encounters and decided that, since people can come off dialysis, there might really be a new acute after having been on dialysis; messy so decided not to implement this
- at some point we defined AKI by Template:ICD10 Guideline KDIGO Guidelines for Acute Renal Failure
- at some point we defined Chronic kidney disease (chronic renal insufficiency, uremia) Stage 1, GFR GT 90 rather than defining CRF by "on dialysis" as we had before
- when we moved to ICD10 there was a desire to maintain that rule
- pre/ancient: We used to not allow this in the old dx coding schema