Edit Data Integrity Check: Query check tmp BedHeld

Are you logged on?

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: CCMDB_legit.

Summary (what is the check, one-liner):
links to related pages:
Firmness (is this a warning only (soft check) or will it stop sending (hard check) - applicable only in CCMDB.accdb app):	None/unknown hard check soft check
Timing (does this query run for all records or only complete ones):	None/unknown complete always
Name of the function or query this is implemented as:	query ''check_tmp_BedHeld''
Implementation date:
Implementation Status:
L_Problem (are false positive special cases addressed in table L_Problems - applicable only in CFE):	None/unknown yes no
App:
Backlogged (is this query cleaned up to date or backlogged? Applicable only in CFE):

Free text:

* dttm entry is always required * for item in ("'''AMA (AWOL)'''", "'''Procedure'''"), [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] must always be after [[Dispo DtTm]] * if [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] = [[Dispo DtTm]] and [[Dispo]] = '''"AMA (left against medical advice)"''', should be "'''AMA protocol'''" and vice versa * for item in ("'''AMA (AWOL)'''", "'''AMA (Protocol)'''"), [[Dispo]] needs to be "AMA" and vice versa * if record has [[Dispo]]="AMA (left against medical advice)" there must be a [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] entry == Log == * 2025-01-08 - updated [[query check_tmp_BedHeld]] to also flag if record has [[Dispo]]="AMA (left against medical advice)" but no [[BedHeldEnd DtTm]] entry * 2023-07-06 - the query is being called out of tmp checker, so it must be running now, considering question dealt with * 2023-05-02 - query defined and written but waiting to find out if this can be before complete or only after (emailed) * 2023-01-11 - Discussed at JALT and decided to not have a cross check for "procedure" against "[[Dispo]]" * 2023-01-10 - Julie identified needed checks == Related articles == {{Related Articles}} [[Category:Tmp check]] [[Category:Registry checks]]

Explain your edit, if you think it needs explanation (e.g. "as discussed with ...", or "content moved to ...", or "duplicate content, see ..."):

This is a minor edit

Watch this page

Cancel