Hypovolemic/Hemorrhagic Shock: Difference between revisions

(41 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{DX tag | Cardiovascular | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |

{{PreICD10 dx | NewDxArticle = Shock, hypovolemic shock or hemorrhagic shock}}

{{DX tag | Cardiovascular Problems | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |

* 1 Epistaxis

* 2 Gastrointestinal Bleed

Line 5:

Line 6:

* 4 Intraperitoneal Bleed

* 5 Post-op Bleed

* 6 AAA Rupture (see ~~127~~ also)

* 6 AAA Rupture (see [[Aneurysm]] also)

* 7 Gynecological Bleeding

* 90 Other | 136-00 | No | 0 | '''Critical Care and Medicine'''| Currently Collected || |}}

~~Hypovolemic shock~~ - ~~it is a state~~ of ~~rapid fluid loss resulting in inadequate circulating blood volume and subsequent inadequate perfusion to organs~~.

== use of subdiagnosis "other" (136-90)==

The use of this sub-diagnosis was discussed at the Task meeting December 5,2012.It was decided that even though this category is used for bleeding problems, we will also use 136-90 for severe shock related to non hemorrhagic hypovolemia.Thanks again to everyone who participated in answering the question I had previously posted on wiki.[[User:GHall|GHall]] 17:17, 2012 December 5 (EST)

136-90 ~~This code shouldn't be used for simple dehydration without shock.However it can be used~~ for ~~'''~~severe ~~dehydration''' resulting in a '''shock state.'''~~

~~{{Discussion}}~~

*what have collectors been doing in past for shock ~~due to dehyration? This category was only meant~~ to ~~be for~~ hypovolemia ~~due~~ to ~~bleeding for different reasons as listed. 139-90 other, is other bleeding causing hypovolemia.~~ I ~~have asked Dr. Garland for further opinion~~ on ~~this. I am not sure the task group really wants to "mix" shock due to dehydration from not drinking with shock due to hyovolemia from bleeds~~.[[User:~~TOstryzniuk~~|~~Trish Ostryzniuk~~]] 16:~~39, 2012 October 19 (CDT)~~

** at the meeting we also talked about dehydration from burns. If we don't code it here, then how should it be coded? I think that was what brought the question forward in the first place... Ttenbergen 17~~:23~~, 2012 ~~October 19~~ (~~CDT~~)

~~[[Category: Shock]]~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DX tag | Cardiovascular | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |
+{{PreICD10 dx | NewDxArticle = Shock, hypovolemic shock or hemorrhagic shock}}
+{{DX tag | Cardiovascular Problems | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |
 * 1 Epistaxis
 * 2 Gastrointestinal Bleed
@@ Line 5: / Line 6: @@
 * 4 Intraperitoneal Bleed
 * 5 Post-op Bleed
-* 6 AAA Rupture (see 127 also)
+* 6 AAA Rupture (see [[Aneurysm]] also)
 * 7 Gynecological Bleeding
 * 90 Other  | 136-00 | No | 0 | '''Critical Care and Medicine'''| Currently Collected ||  |}}
-Hypovolemic shock - it is a state of rapid fluid loss resulting in inadequate circulating blood volume and subsequent inadequate perfusion to organs.
+== use of subdiagnosis "other" (136-90)==
+The use of this sub-diagnosis was discussed at the Task meeting December 5,2012.It was decided that even though this category is used for bleeding problems, we will also use 136-90 for severe shock related to non hemorrhagic hypovolemia.Thanks again to everyone who participated in answering the question I had previously posted on wiki.[[User:GHall|GHall]] 17:17, 2012 December 5 (EST)
--90 This code shouldn't be used for simple dehydration without shock.However it can be used for '''severe dehydration''' resulting in a '''shock state.'''
-{{Discussion}}
-*what have collectors been doing in past for shock due to dehyration?  This category was only meant to be for hypovolemia due to bleeding for different reasons as listed.  139-90 other, is other bleeding causing hypovolemia.  I have asked Dr. Garland for further opinion on this.  I am not sure the task group really wants to  "mix" shock due to dehydration from not drinking with shock due to hyovolemia from bleeds.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:39, 2012 October 19 (CDT)
-** at the meeting we also talked about dehydration from burns. If we don't code it here, then how should it be coded? I think that was what brought the question forward in the first place... Ttenbergen 17:23, 2012 October 19 (CDT)
-[[Category: Shock]]