Query check tmp Boarding Loc Service first same: Difference between revisions

(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 4:

|DIC_firmness=hard check

|DIC_timing=complete

|DIC_coding= query check_tmp_Boarding_Loc_Service_first_same

|DIC_coding= query ''check_tmp_Boarding_Loc_Service_first_same''

|DIC_implementation_date=2021-04-29

|DIC_status=implemented

Line 10:

}}

Uses convenience queries ''query ~~L_First_Boarding_Loc''~~ and ''query ~~L_First_Service''~~

We decided during [[Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2021#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – April 22, 2021]] that the first [[Service tmp entry]] DtTm should be the same as that for the first [[Boarding Loc]] entry. This [[cross check]] validates that.

Uses convenience queries [[Created_FirstLocation query]] and [[Created_FirstService query]]

Discussed at task 2021-04-29 that this will remain complete only for now.

== Log ==

2021-04-29 - Implemented for [[RecordStatus]] = "complete" only because there were tons of errors that would prevent sending if I do it for all; do we want to shift to doing it for all?

* 2022-05-25 - changed the query to a complete only query so the items can initially be entered as per Cognos, and only changed to our corrected values on chart completion, to allow keeping the [[Boarding Loc]] records linked to their counterpart [[Cognos2 Units table]] records* 2022-04-14 - removed ''Accept DtTm'' in preparation for retiring this concept

* 2022-02-14 - excluded [[RecordStatus]] <>"sent" And <>"deleted"

* 2022-02-09 - included check for ''Accept DtTm'' being same as well

* 2021-10-07 - decided to shift this query to doing the check for complete and incomplete, since the [[Statistician]] does use this data for incomplete profiles

* 2021-05-03 - updated [[Created_FirstLocation query]] and [[Created_FirstService query]] which had used "first" where they should have used "min"

* 2021-04-29 - Implemented for [[RecordStatus]] = "complete" only because there were tons of errors that would prevent sending if I do it for all; do we want to shift to doing it for all?

== Related articles ==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |DIC_firmness=hard check
 |DIC_timing=complete
-|DIC_coding= query check_tmp_Boarding_Loc_Service_first_same
+|DIC_coding= query ''check_tmp_Boarding_Loc_Service_first_same''
 |DIC_implementation_date=2021-04-29
 |DIC_status=implemented
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 }}
-Uses convenience queries ''query L_First_Boarding_Loc'' and ''query L_First_Service''
+We decided during [[Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2021#ICU Database Task Group Meeting – April 22, 2021]] that the first [[Service tmp entry]] DtTm should be the same as that for the first [[Boarding Loc]] entry. This [[cross check]] validates that.
+Uses convenience queries [[Created_FirstLocation query]] and [[Created_FirstService query]]
+Discussed at task 2021-04-29 that this will remain complete only for now.
 == Log ==
--04-29 - Implemented for [[RecordStatus]] = "complete" only because there were tons of errors that would prevent sending if I do it for all; do we want to shift to doing it for all?
+* 2022-05-25 - changed the query to a complete only query so the items can initially be entered as per Cognos, and only changed to our corrected values on chart completion, to allow keeping the [[Boarding Loc]] records linked to their counterpart [[Cognos2 Units table]] records* 2022-04-14 - removed ''Accept DtTm'' in preparation for retiring this concept
+* 2022-02-14 - excluded [[RecordStatus]] <>"sent" And <>"deleted"
+* 2022-02-09 - included check for ''Accept DtTm'' being same as well
+* 2021-10-07 - decided to shift this query to doing the check for complete and incomplete, since the [[Statistician]] does use this data for incomplete profiles
+* 2021-05-03 - updated [[Created_FirstLocation query]] and [[Created_FirstService query]] which had used "first" where they should have used "min"
+* 2021-04-29 - Implemented for [[RecordStatus]] = "complete" only because there were tons of errors that would prevent sending if I do it for all; do we want to shift to doing it for all?
 == Related articles ==