Overstay2 colour: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* A 2 x 2 classification table for incrementing probability levels from 0.001 to 0.200 helps visualize the performance of the predicted results with actual outcomes. | * A 2 x 2 classification table for incrementing probability levels from 0.001 to 0.200 helps visualize the performance of the predicted results with actual outcomes. | ||
* Sensitivity (true positive rate) is the proportion of actual positives correctly identified by the predicted results. High sensitivity means few false negatives. | * Sensitivity (true positive rate) is the proportion of actual positives correctly identified by the predicted results. High sensitivity means few false negatives. | ||
* Specificity (true negative rate) is the proportion of actual negatives correctly identified by the predicted results. High specificity means few false positives. | * Specificity (true negative rate) is the proportion of actual negatives correctly identified by the predicted results. High specificity means few false positives. | ||
* Positive Predicted Value (PPV) is the likelihood that a positive result is a true positive. | |||
* Negative Predicted Value (NPV) is the likelihood that a negative result is a true negative. | |||
* False Positive (FP) Rate is the proportion of actual negatives but predicted incorrectly as positives. | |||
* False Negative (FN) Rate is the proportion of actual positives but predicted incorrectly as negatives. | |||
* Optimal threshold is the probability level which shows equal or close to equal sensitivity or specificity in the testing data set. This threshold (also called cut-off) is being used to classify patients. | * Optimal threshold is the probability level which shows equal or close to equal sensitivity or specificity in the testing data set. This threshold (also called cut-off) is being used to classify patients. | ||
* The optimal threshold by site is below: | * The optimal threshold by site is below: | ||
{| class="wikitable notsortable" | {| class="wikitable notsortable" | ||
!Site !! Data Set!! Optimal Cut-off !! Sensitivity !! Specificity || PPV || NPV | !Site !! Data Set!! Optimal Cut-off !! Sensitivity !! Specificity || PPV || NPV || FP Rate || FN Rate | ||
|- | |- | ||
| GGH || Training|| 0. | | GGH || Training|| 0.076|| 74.2 || 74.3 || 16.1 || 97.7 || 25.7 || 25.8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| GGH || Validation|| 0. | | GGH || Validation|| 0.079|| 74.4 || 74.5 || 16.4 || 97.7 || 25.5 || 25.6 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| HSC || Training|| || || || || | | HSC || Training|| || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| HSC || Validation|| || || || || | | HSC || Validation|| || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| STB || Training|| || || || || | | STB || Training|| || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| STB || Validation|| || || || || | | STB || Validation|| || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
There was a concern that this would have overwhelmed the [[Overstay2 processes on the units to reduce discharge delay]] so we considered a [[#pragmatic threshold]]. | |||
=== Pragmatic threshold === | === Pragmatic threshold === | ||
We considered whether we should | We considered whether we should change the threshold from the [[#Optimal threshold]] to reduce the number of patients who are assigned as red, in addition to modifying the [[Overstay2 processes on the units to reduce discharge delay]] . | ||
{| class="wikitable notsortable" | |||
!Site !! Data Set!! Pragmatic Cut-off !! Sensitivity !! Specificity || PPV || NPV || FP Rate || FN Rate | |||
|- | |||
| GGH || Training|| 0.094|| 67.2 || 79.0 || 17.5 || 97.3 || 21.0|| 32.8 | |||
|- | |||
| HSC || Training|| || || || || || || | |||
|- | |||
| STB || Training|| || || || || || || | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
{{collapsable | always = I think this can go, just leaving it until confirmed | full= | {{collapsable | always = I think this can go, just leaving it until confirmed | full= | ||