Boarding Loc: Difference between revisions

(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 25:

=== How to enter ===

You can use the [["make loc" button]] to generate and pre-populate these entries.

*Use tmp fields:

** Project: '''{{PAGENAME}}'''

Line 34:

** Item:

*** for the initial unit or ER and each physical move to another unit, enter the location by using the "make loc" button in [[Patient Viewer Tab Cognos ADT2]]

*** ~~please note that~~ if a boarding location appears in COGNOS but the patient does NOT move/arrive to that boarding location, do NOT enter that boarding location. We only capture boarding locations where the patient physically arrives

*** if a boarding location appears in COGNOS but the patient does NOT move/arrive to that boarding location, do NOT enter that boarding location. We only capture boarding locations where the patient physically arrives (also see [[Wrong service or unit entries in Cognos]])

**** if the ward is not available in the dropdown, please notify Tina, Lisa, and Julie; Tina/Lisa will add the location to the dropdown and update the wiki as needed~~; Julie will note the change for her reports. eg. during the various COVID waves, many surgical wards were used for medicine overflow or COVID patients~~

**** if the ward is not available in the dropdown, please notify Tina, Lisa, and Julie; Tina/Lisa will add the location to the dropdown and update the wiki as needed

{{Discuss |

**** leave what is in Cognos, the main office doesn't use this part for anything for home locations, but it can be used to crosscheck accuracy.

***** what is this about? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:42, 19 August 2025 (CDT)

}}

* '''no location entered''' is the default

** that entry will not be allowed in a complete record; it is automatically deleted when by Cognos Make Loc button, but needs to be removed before setting a record to complete if it is still present.

Line 49:

Line 52:

* No two different [[Boarding Loc]] records can have same start_dt and start_tm; if two locations have the same Start_DtTm in [[CSS]]/[[Cognos2 Unit Starter]] this is an error.

* The date and time for these entries must be confirmed by looking at the chart, specifically orders, flowsheets, and progress notes

{{DL | It says:

{{DJ | It says:

* Change one to be off by one minute, put a note in [[Notes field]] to check boarding location to confirm the correct date and time for the boarding locations of concern.

** how does that fit in with reviewing reality in the chart?

** I don't know what you mean by this? It means you double check the correct first service and first and second boarding loc dttm [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 21:14, 6 September 2025 (CDT)

*** Well, it seems like this triggers an error check, so you pull the times a minute apart to overcome the error check and put a note to remind you to check later. So either the check should run later (on complete or send) or we shouldn't have it at all. But a check that just gets you to "tweak" the data to make it go away isn't a good idea.

* sure if you can have the cross check on completion that would be better, the prior scenario is almost always for SICU admissions from ER [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 15:51, 26 November 2025 (CST)

** Julie, do you use Boarding Loc info on incomplete charts? Would either the current collection practice, or delaying the check, mess with measures or indicators? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 22:09, 26 November 2025 (CST)

}}

Line 75:

Line 82:

* I have no idea, I suppose this can happen although I have not ever seen this at any of the facilities, I believe you were the original author of this so feel free to do what you want with this [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:46, 6 August 2025 (CDT)

** Julie, do you know what this is about? If the same applies for Med as for ICU in this, then lets get rid of the confusing entry. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:23, 6 August 2025 (CDT)

*** we have one case S4_STB_Med-2892 where first3 days at SBGH ICMS then transferred to SBGH-L2CC.--[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:42, 18 August 2025 (CDT) }}

*** we have one case S4_STB_Med-2892 where first3 days at SBGH ICMS then transferred to SBGH-L2CC.--[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:42, 18 August 2025 (CDT)

**** What else would they use? The entry would come from Cognos, no? It's entered by drop-down, so I don't think they could enter anything but the actual entry. Is this stated here really as a reminder for you, in case this happens again? If so, would it be better to store it in L_Problems table? If it is an instruction to collectors, would you explain further what you actually intend? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:33, 19 August 2025 (CDT)

}}

'''For CC patients boarding on a Med ward where we collect''', enter "GRA_Med"/"HSC_Med"/"STB_Med" as applicable. We added these boarding loc options specifically for this scenario, and they are available only for [[Critical Care program]] admissions.

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 === How to enter ===
 You can use the [["make loc" button]] to generate and pre-populate these entries.
 *Use tmp fields:
 ** Project: '''{{PAGENAME}}'''
@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 ** Item:
 *** for the initial unit or ER and each physical move to another unit, enter the location by using the "make loc" button in [[Patient Viewer Tab Cognos ADT2]]
-*** please note that if a boarding location appears in COGNOS but the patient does NOT move/arrive to that boarding location, do NOT enter that boarding location.  We only capture boarding locations where the patient physically arrives
+*** if a boarding location appears in COGNOS but the patient does NOT move/arrive to that boarding location, do NOT enter that boarding location.  We only capture boarding locations where the patient physically arrives (also see [[Wrong service or unit entries in Cognos]])
-**** if the ward is not available in the dropdown, please notify Tina, Lisa, and Julie; Tina/Lisa will add the location to the dropdown and update the wiki as needed; Julie will note the change for her reports. eg. during the various COVID waves, many surgical wards were used for medicine overflow or COVID patients
+**** if the ward is not available in the dropdown, please notify Tina, Lisa, and Julie; Tina/Lisa will add the location to the dropdown and update the wiki as needed
+{{Discuss |
 **** leave what is in Cognos, the main office doesn't use this part for anything for home locations, but it can be used to crosscheck accuracy.
+***** what is this about? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:42, 19 August 2025 (CDT)
+}}
 * '''no location entered''' is the default
 ** that entry will not be allowed in a complete record; it is automatically deleted when by Cognos Make Loc button, but needs to be removed before setting a record to complete if it is still present.
@@ Line 49: / Line 52: @@
 * No two different [[Boarding Loc]] records can have same start_dt and start_tm; if two locations have the same Start_DtTm in [[CSS]]/[[Cognos2 Unit Starter]] this is an error.
 * The date and time for these entries must be confirmed by looking at the chart, specifically orders, flowsheets, and progress notes
-{{DL | It says:
+{{DJ | It says:
 * Change one to be off by one minute, put a note in [[Notes field]] to check boarding location to confirm the correct date and time for the boarding locations of concern.
 ** how does that fit in with reviewing reality in the chart?
+** I don't know what you mean by this?  It means you double check the correct first service and first and second boarding loc dttm [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 21:14, 6 September 2025 (CDT)
+*** Well, it seems like this triggers an error check, so you pull the times a minute apart to overcome the error check and put a note to remind you to check later. So either the check should run later (on complete or send) or we shouldn't have it at all. But a check that just gets you to "tweak" the data to make it go away isn't a good idea.
+* sure if you can have the cross check on completion that would be better, the prior scenario is almost always for SICU admissions from ER [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 15:51, 26 November 2025 (CST)
+** Julie, do you use Boarding Loc info on incomplete charts? Would either the current collection practice, or delaying the check, mess with measures or indicators? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 22:09, 26 November 2025 (CST)
 }}
@@ Line 75: / Line 82: @@
 * I have no idea, I suppose this can happen although I have not ever seen this at any of the facilities, I believe you were the original author of this so feel free to do what you want with this [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:46, 6 August 2025 (CDT)
 ** Julie, do you know what this is about? If the same applies for Med as for ICU in this, then lets get rid of the confusing entry. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:23, 6 August 2025 (CDT)
-*** we have one  case S4_STB_Med-2892 where first3 days at SBGH ICMS then transferred to SBGH-L2CC.--[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:42, 18 August 2025 (CDT) }}
+*** we have one  case S4_STB_Med-2892 where first3 days at SBGH ICMS then transferred to SBGH-L2CC.--[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:42, 18 August 2025 (CDT)
+**** What else would they use? The entry would come from Cognos, no? It's entered by drop-down, so I don't think they could enter anything but the actual entry. Is this stated here really as a reminder for you, in case this happens again? If so, would it be better to store it in L_Problems table? If it is an instruction to collectors, would you explain further what you actually intend?  [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:33, 19 August 2025 (CDT)
+}}
 '''For CC patients boarding on a Med ward where we collect''', enter "GRA_Med"/"HSC_Med"/"STB_Med" as applicable. We added these boarding loc options specifically for this scenario, and they are available only for [[Critical Care program]] admissions.