Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Log |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| DIC_firmness = hard check | | DIC_firmness = hard check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB. | | DIC_app = CCMDB.accdb | ||
| DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | | DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | ||
| DIC_status = | | DIC_status = implemented | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | | DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown. | The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown. | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
* 2020-03-11 - confirmed again that a 9-digit chart will throw error; emailed Pagasa | |||
* 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] triggers again | |||
* 2019-08-22 - [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] was triggered even though this check exists | |||
* 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date | * 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date | ||