Lab and culture reports: Difference between revisions

m moved info from here to Labs Complete which is what it was about.
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== Additional Information ==
== Additional Information ==
*This question is tied in to identification of a clinical infection.
*This is about identification of a clinical infection.
**For disorders believed to be infectious, we have a list of pathogens, and if the pathogen is never identified then you can use '''[[Infectious organism, unknown]]'''.
**For disorders believed to be infectious, we have a list of pathogens, and if the pathogen is never identified then you can use '''[[Infectious organism, unknown]]'''.
*Even if you do identify one or more organisms that are '''''potential''''' pathogens, usually it requires clinical correlation to decide whether it/they are actually pathogenic in this patient
*Even if you do identify one or more organisms that are '''''potential''''' pathogens, usually it requires clinical correlation to decide whether it/they are actually pathogenic in this patient
Line 13: Line 13:
**Again, the answer is generally "Yes" with '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', and generally "No" elsewise -- deviating from these generalities can be done if you've got an excellent, scientific rationale.
**Again, the answer is generally "Yes" with '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', and generally "No" elsewise -- deviating from these generalities can be done if you've got an excellent, scientific rationale.


== Cross-checks ==
How and when infections are identified is relevant to [[Attribution of infections]].
See [[Pathogens|CCDMB Data Integrity Checks on Pathogens page (needs review)]].  


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==