SAS Data Integrity Checks: Difference between revisions

(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

~~Julie runs checks that~~ are ~~not~~ in [[~~:Category:Data Integrity Checks~~]]. ~~They are~~ in in the ~~CHK*.sas programs under the~~

All regular tests, e.g. those run before [[Reporting]], are now also available in [[CFE]]. Julie has the old implementation for some of these in SAS in the folllowing location:

* X:\Julie\SAS\CriticalCare

* {{S:\MED\MED_CCMED}}Julie\SAS\CriticalCare

* X:\Julie\SAS\Medicine

* {{S:\MED\MED_CCMED}}Julie\SAS\Medicine

==~~= Discussion =~~==

== Related articles ==

* I don't think reverse-engineering code is a good idea. Most of these query requests have resulted in further questions, and in order to discuss them they need to be in English, not SAS or SQL. Also, writing them out in English will finally document what is being done. Only Julie knows what she intended with any individual query she wrote, so she would be in the best position to state what checks should be transferred into the Cleaner. I would suggest concentrating on checks that deal with individual patients for now, rather than checks that compare consecutive encounters, mostly because her implementation is probably more efficient at the latter, whereas ours will be slow at it until we are able to move to a different system. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:00, 27 October 2008 (CDT)

[[Category: SAS Data Integrity Checks]]

[[Category:SAS Data Integrity Checks]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Julie runs checks that are not in [[:Category:Data Integrity Checks]]. They are in in the CHK*.sas programs under the
+All regular tests, e.g. those run before [[Reporting]], are now also available in [[CFE]]. Julie has the old implementation for some of these in SAS in the folllowing location:
-* X:\Julie\SAS\CriticalCare
+* {{S:\MED\MED_CCMED}}Julie\SAS\CriticalCare
-* X:\Julie\SAS\Medicine
+* {{S:\MED\MED_CCMED}}Julie\SAS\Medicine
-=== Discussion ===
+== Related articles ==
-* I don't think reverse-engineering code is a good idea. Most of these query requests have resulted in further questions, and in order to discuss them they need to be in English, not SAS or SQL. Also, writing them out in English will finally document what is being done. Only Julie knows what she intended with any individual query she wrote, so she would be in the best position to state what checks should be transferred into the Cleaner. I would suggest concentrating on checks that deal with individual patients for now, rather than checks that compare consecutive encounters, mostly because her implementation is probably more efficient at the latter, whereas ours will be slow at it until we are able to move to a different system. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:00, 27 October 2008 (CDT)
+{{Related Articles}}
-[[Category: SAS Data Integrity Checks]]
+[[Category:SAS Data Integrity Checks]]