Renal Coding Considerations (old): Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===discussion=== | ===discussion=== | ||
When these are addressed, please edit [[Requested CCMDB changes for the next version#ARF & CRF & ARI Integrity Check | Requested CCMDB changes for the next version]] to state the discussion is done so the checks can be implemented in [[CCMDB.mdb]]. | |||
* I think we decided to get rid of the renal transplant part for this, right? If so, please remove both that part and this comment... Otherwise, the one-week clock is now ticking for its removal, pending an explanation why it should not be removed. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:57, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | * I think we decided to get rid of the renal transplant part for this, right? If so, please remove both that part and this comment... Otherwise, the one-week clock is now ticking for its removal, pending an explanation why it should not be removed. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:57, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | ||
as moved from [[Requested CCMDB changes for the next version#ARF & CRF & ARI Integrity Check | Requested CCMDB changes for the next version]]: | |||
* The 364 is new since the discussion about the cleaner. What is it about? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:55, 5 November 2008 (CST) | |||
**Yes, since I have been further reviewing patient profiles in more detail from the problems that SAS has generated, I see renal insufficiency (364) being coded in admit or complication DX slots for patients who have a comorbid condition of chronic renal failure (351). | |||
*This article mentions something about transplant. Is that still accurate? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:12, 18 February 2009 (CST) | |||